Meaning: The quote by Howard Fineman touches upon the concept of a neutral, mainstream national media and its rise to dominance during and after World War II. It suggests that the idea of a neutral media became prevalent during this period, coinciding with the emergence of a temporary moderate consensus that governed the country. To fully understand the significance of this quote, it is essential to delve into the historical context that shaped the media landscape during and after World War II.

Prior to World War II, the media in the United States was characterized by a diverse range of viewpoints and ideologies. Partisan newspapers and radio broadcasts were common, and the concept of a neutral, mainstream national media was not as pronounced as it is today. However, the wartime experience brought about significant changes in the media landscape. The need for unified messaging and information dissemination during the war led to a greater emphasis on objectivity and neutrality in reporting.

As the war drew to a close, the United States emerged as a global superpower, and the aftermath of the conflict saw the country transitioning into a new era. This period was marked by a sense of unity and consensus, as the nation sought to rebuild and redefine its role on the world stage. It was during this time that the notion of a neutral, mainstream national media gained prominence, reflecting the broader societal shift towards moderation and consensus.

The temporary moderate consensus that Fineman refers to reflects the era of relative political and social stability that followed World War II. This period, often referred to as the "postwar consensus," was characterized by a shared commitment to economic prosperity, social cohesion, and international cooperation. This consensus extended to the media, with a growing emphasis on balanced and objective reporting that transcended partisan divides.

The rise of television as a dominant medium further shaped the trajectory of the media during this period. The emergence of national broadcast networks brought about a new level of influence and reach for the media, solidifying the concept of a mainstream, neutral voice that catered to a broad audience. The era of the 1950s and 1960s saw the consolidation of this vision of the national media, with iconic figures such as Walter Cronkite embodying the trusted, impartial journalist.

However, it is important to note that the notion of a neutral, mainstream national media has been a subject of ongoing debate and critique. Critics argue that the idea of neutrality is inherently flawed, as it often reflects the perspectives and interests of those in power. Furthermore, the rise of alternative and independent media outlets in recent decades has challenged the dominance of the mainstream narrative, highlighting the complexities of achieving true neutrality in media representation.

In conclusion, Howard Fineman's quote captures a pivotal moment in the evolution of the American media landscape. The emergence of a neutral, mainstream national media during and after World War II reflected broader societal shifts and the quest for consensus in a time of significant change. While the concept of a neutral media has been influential, it is crucial to critically examine the complexities and limitations of achieving true neutrality in media representation.