Meaning: This quote, "I was never a true journalist, I was a movie critic," by Guillermo Infante, a novelist, reflects the distinction between being a traditional journalist and a specialized critic. It suggests that the speaker, presumably Guillermo Infante, sees a clear difference between the roles of a journalist and a movie critic, with the implication that being a journalist involves certain qualities or responsibilities that the speaker does not identify with. This quote can be interpreted in several ways, and it raises questions about the nature of journalism, the role of criticism, and the relationship between the two.

Guillermo Infante's statement may be seen as a declaration of self-awareness and professional identity. By asserting that he was not a "true journalist," he acknowledges that his work as a movie critic differs significantly from the conventional duties and practices associated with journalism. This could imply that he does not adhere to the same standards of objectivity or news reporting that are typically expected of journalists. Instead, Infante sees himself primarily as a critic, someone whose role is to analyze and evaluate films through a particular lens, such as aesthetics, storytelling, or cultural significance.

Furthermore, Infante's remark may also reflect a broader commentary on the distinctions between journalism and criticism as forms of media discourse. While journalism is often associated with reporting news, facts, and events in an objective and impartial manner, criticism involves offering subjective opinions, interpretations, and evaluations of cultural products, such as films, literature, or art. Infante's acknowledgment of his identity as a movie critic may signal his recognition of the subjective nature of criticism and its departure from the objective standards of traditional journalism.

Moreover, the quote can be seen as an affirmation of the value and integrity of criticism as a distinct form of cultural commentary. By differentiating himself from a "true journalist," Infante may be emphasizing the importance of critical analysis and interpretation in shaping cultural discourse. In this sense, he elevates the role of the critic as a specialist with a unique perspective and expertise in their chosen field, highlighting the significance of critical voices in contributing to the understanding and appreciation of artistic works.

In a broader context, Guillermo Infante's quote invites reflection on the evolving landscape of media and cultural commentary. In an era characterized by the proliferation of online platforms, social media, and diverse voices, the distinction between journalism and criticism may become increasingly blurred. The traditional boundaries between objective reporting and subjective analysis are being challenged, and individuals like Infante, who operate in the realm of cultural criticism, play a vital role in shaping public discourse and opinion.

In conclusion, Guillermo Infante's quote, "I was never a true journalist, I was a movie critic," encapsulates a nuanced perspective on the roles of journalism and criticism. It prompts us to consider the distinct qualities and responsibilities associated with these forms of media discourse, as well as the evolving nature of cultural commentary in contemporary society. Infante's assertion serves as a reminder of the diversity of voices and perspectives that contribute to our understanding of the world around us, and the value of critical analysis in shaping our cultural landscape.