Meaning: The quote by journalist Ashleigh Banfield raises important questions about the nature of journalism and media coverage during times of conflict. In this quote, Banfield reflects on the limitations of media reporting and the ethical responsibilities of journalists in conveying the full scope of the events they are covering.

Banfield's observation, "We didn't see what happened after mortars landed, only the puff of smoke," highlights the inherent challenge of war reporting. Often, the focus of media coverage is on the immediate impact of violent incidents, such as the explosion of mortars, without delving into the aftermath or the human toll that ensues. This selective portrayal of war can lead to an incomplete understanding of the true extent of the suffering and devastation experienced by those caught in the midst of conflict.

Furthermore, Banfield's assertion that "There were horrors that were completely left out of this war" underscores the notion that certain aspects of war and its impact are overlooked or underreported in mainstream media. This raises concerns about the ethical responsibility of journalists to provide comprehensive and balanced coverage that accurately represents the realities of war, including the human cost, displacement, and long-term consequences.

The question posed by Banfield, "So was this journalism? Or was this coverage?" prompts a critical examination of the distinction between journalism as a practice of seeking and presenting the truth, and mere coverage as a superficial portrayal of events. Banfield challenges the conventional norms of war reporting and urges a reevaluation of the ethical standards and responsibilities of journalists in conveying the full story of conflict.

In analyzing Banfield's quote, it is essential to consider the broader context of media reporting on war and conflict. The challenges faced by journalists in war zones, including safety risks, censorship, and limited access to information, can impact the depth and accuracy of their reporting. Moreover, the influence of political agendas, media biases, and commercial interests can shape the narrative of war coverage, potentially leading to a skewed or incomplete representation of the realities on the ground.

To address the issues raised by Banfield, it is crucial for journalists to uphold the principles of ethical reporting, including the pursuit of truth, accuracy, and the amplification of diverse voices and perspectives. This requires a commitment to in-depth investigative journalism that goes beyond the sensationalism of violent events to capture the broader impact of war on individuals, communities, and societies.

Additionally, the quote serves as a reminder of the power and responsibility of media organizations in shaping public perception and understanding of war. By highlighting the limitations of mainstream war coverage, Banfield calls for a more nuanced, empathetic, and comprehensive approach to reporting that reflects the complexities and human realities of conflict.

In conclusion, Ashleigh Banfield's quote encapsulates the complexities and ethical dilemmas inherent in war reporting. It challenges journalists, media organizations, and audiences to critically examine the nature of journalism and the responsibilities of reporting on conflict. By promoting a deeper understanding of the human impact of war and advocating for ethical and comprehensive reporting, Banfield's quote encourages a more empathetic and truthful portrayal of the realities of war in the media.