Meaning: The quote by F. Lucas, a critic, reflects on the nature of English prose, emphasizing the importance of sound and rhythm over strict adherence to rules. Lucas suggests that while there are some fundamental principles to be followed, the overall cadence and flow of prose should be guided by the writer's and reader's intuition rather than rigid regulations. This viewpoint speaks to the artistic and intuitive nature of language, highlighting the role of individual expression and interpretation in the creation and understanding of written works.

In essence, Lucas is advocating for a more organic and instinctive approach to writing and reading English prose. He acknowledges that there are indeed foundational principles that govern effective communication and literary expression. However, he also emphasizes the significance of allowing the natural cadence and musicality of the language to guide the writing process, as well as the reader's experience of the text.

The notion that writers and readers should trust their "ears" aligns with the idea that language is not solely a set of rigid rules and structures, but rather a living, breathing entity with its own inherent rhythm and melody. This perspective encourages a more intuitive and sensory engagement with language, whereby writers and readers are attuned to the inherent musicality and harmonious qualities of prose.

Furthermore, Lucas's assertion that the sound and rhythm of English prose are matters of trust implies a certain level of faith in the inherent beauty and effectiveness of language itself. It suggests that there is a natural harmony and resonance within the language that can be felt and appreciated without the need for strict adherence to prescriptive rules and guidelines. This perspective underscores the idea that language is a dynamic and expressive medium that transcends mere technicalities, inviting a more emotive and instinctual response from both writers and readers.

From a writer's perspective, this quote encourages the cultivation of a finely tuned ear for the nuances of language, urging writers to pay attention to the musicality and rhythm of their prose. Rather than solely relying on rigid rules and structures, writers are prompted to develop a sensitivity to the cadence and flow of their writing, allowing the natural ebb and flow of the language to guide their creative process.

On the reader's end, Lucas's quote invites an appreciation for the sensory experience of language. It encourages readers to engage with prose on a deeper, more intuitive level, attuning themselves to the inherent musicality and rhythm of the text. This approach to reading emphasizes the emotional and sensory impact of language, inviting readers to trust their instincts and immerse themselves in the natural beauty of well-crafted prose.

In conclusion, F. Lucas's quote encapsulates a perspective that elevates the organic and intuitive qualities of English prose, emphasizing the significance of sound and rhythm as essential elements of literary expression. By advocating for a reliance on "ears" over rigid rules, Lucas underscores the dynamic and expressive nature of language, inviting both writers and readers to engage with prose in a more instinctual and emotive manner. This viewpoint celebrates the innate musicality and harmony of language, encouraging a deeper appreciation for the artistry and beauty of well-crafted writing.