Meaning: The quote by Catharine MacKinnon, a prominent feminist legal scholar and activist, challenges the notion that there are no essential human universals. In essence, she is arguing against the belief that there are no fundamental and universal aspects of human experience or identity. This perspective is often associated with postmodernist and relativist theories that emphasize the diversity and variability of human cultures and experiences. MacKinnon's assertion that the idea of there being nothing essential is dogma suggests that she sees this perspective as an unquestioned or rigidly held belief within certain intellectual or ideological circles.

Catharine MacKinnon is known for her work in the fields of feminist legal theory, sexual harassment law, and pornography. Her writings have been influential in shaping legal and social understandings of gender, sexuality, and power. In this quote, she is likely addressing the implications of denying the existence of essential human universals, particularly in the context of social justice and human rights.

The concept of human universals has been a topic of debate and inquiry across various disciplines, including anthropology, psychology, and philosophy. Proponents of the idea of human universals argue that there are certain fundamental aspects of human existence that are shared across cultures and historical contexts. These may include basic physiological needs, cognitive processes, emotional experiences, and moral principles. Advocates for the existence of human universals often seek to identify and understand these commonalities as a means of promoting cross-cultural understanding and ethical frameworks.

On the other hand, critics of the concept of human universals, as alluded to in MacKinnon's quote, argue that such claims often reflect ethnocentric or Eurocentric perspectives that overlook the diversity and complexity of human experiences. They emphasize the importance of recognizing and valuing cultural differences, challenging universalizing narratives that may serve to marginalize or oppress certain groups. In the context of social justice and human rights advocacy, this perspective often informs efforts to center the voices and experiences of marginalized or historically oppressed communities.

The reference to being "shot at dawn" in MacKinnon's quote may be interpreted as a metaphor for the consequences of denying the existence of essential human universals. It suggests that the stakes of this debate are high, particularly for those who are most vulnerable or at risk within society. The implication is that a dismissive attitude towards the idea of human universals can have real and detrimental effects on individuals and communities who are marginalized or targeted for violence and oppression.

In her broader body of work, MacKinnon has been deeply engaged with issues of gender-based violence, exploitation, and the intersection of law and power. Her advocacy has been aimed at challenging structures of oppression and advocating for legal and social reforms that address the systemic inequalities faced by women and other marginalized groups. Within this context, her critique of the dismissal of human universals can be understood as part of her broader effort to assert the fundamental rights and dignity of all individuals, particularly those who have been historically marginalized or devalued by societal norms and structures.

Overall, Catharine MacKinnon's quote challenges the prevailing notion that there are no essential human universals and underscores the significance of recognizing and affirming common aspects of human experience and identity. In doing so, she raises important questions about the implications of this perspective for social justice, human rights, and the ongoing struggle for equality and dignity for all individuals.