Meaning: This quote by Harold MacMillan, a British politician who served as Prime Minister from 1957 to 1963, reflects a skepticism towards the authority of experts and the potential for their influence to become authoritarian in nature. The concept of the "divine right of kings" refers to the medieval belief that monarchs were appointed by God and therefore their rule was absolute and unquestionable. This system of governance was gradually challenged and dismantled over time, particularly during the Enlightenment period when the idea of individual rights and democratic governance gained prominence.

In the context of MacMillan's quote, the "divine right of experts" can be interpreted as a cautionary warning against the uncritical acceptance of the expertise and authority of specialists in various fields. It suggests that just as the divine right of kings was questioned and ultimately rejected, so too should the unquestioned authority of experts be subject to scrutiny and challenge.

MacMillan's quote resonates with the ongoing debate about the role of expertise and technocracy in modern societies. On one hand, the expertise of professionals and specialists is essential for the functioning of complex systems and the advancement of knowledge and technology. However, there is also a risk that the authority of experts can become overbearing and exclusionary, leading to a perceived lack of accountability and transparency in decision-making processes.

The rise of technocracy, which prioritizes the rule of experts and professionals in governance and policy-making, has been met with criticism from those who argue that it can undermine democratic principles and the participation of the broader public in decision-making. This tension between expertise and democracy is encapsulated in MacMillan's quote, which serves as a reminder that the authority of experts should not be elevated to a level that replicates the unquestionable power historically associated with monarchs.

In contemporary society, the influence of experts is evident in various domains, including politics, economics, science, and technology. While expertise is crucial for addressing complex challenges and making informed decisions, it is important to maintain a balance that allows for public scrutiny and participation in the decision-making process. This aligns with the principles of democratic governance, where the legitimacy of authority is derived from the consent and participation of the governed.

MacMillan's quote encourages critical thinking and a healthy skepticism towards the authority of experts, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach that values expertise while also upholding democratic principles. It serves as a reminder that the rejection of the divine right of kings was a pivotal moment in the advancement of democratic values, and a similar vigilance is necessary to ensure that the authority of experts does not become a new form of unaccountable power.

In conclusion, Harold MacMillan's quote challenges us to reflect on the role of expertise in modern society and the potential implications of its unchecked authority. It prompts us to consider the balance between expertise and democratic governance, highlighting the importance of maintaining accountability and transparency in decision-making processes. Ultimately, the quote serves as a timely reminder of the need to critically evaluate the influence of experts and ensure that their authority is exercised in a manner that upholds democratic principles and the participation of the broader public.