Meaning: This quote by journalist Chris Matthews captures a stark contrast in the leadership styles and philosophies of two U.S. presidents, Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Matthews suggests that Reagan's approach was centered on a strong sense of American identity and patriotism, while Obama's approach was more global in nature, emphasizing inclusivity and a sense of transcendence. The quote also implies that Obama's leadership style may have been perceived as somewhat messianic or divine.

Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, was known for his unwavering commitment to American exceptionalism and his belief in the greatness of the United States. His presidency was characterized by a robust foreign policy, a focus on national security, and a fervent belief in the principles of individual liberty, free markets, and limited government. Reagan's rhetoric often emphasized the idea of American strength and resilience, and he frequently spoke of the United States as a shining city upon a hill, a beacon of hope and freedom for the world.

In contrast, Barack Obama, the 44th President of the United States, adopted a more cosmopolitan and inclusive approach to leadership. Obama's presidency was marked by a commitment to multilateralism, diplomacy, and engagement with the international community. He often spoke about the interconnectedness of global issues and the need for collaborative solutions that transcended national boundaries. Obama's rhetoric emphasized the idea of American leadership as a force for positive change in the world, promoting values of tolerance, diversity, and unity.

Matthews' characterization of Obama as "sort of God" and as someone who is "going to bring all different sides together" reflects a common critique of Obama's leadership style. Some critics have argued that Obama's emphasis on global cooperation and his aspirational rhetoric contributed to an image of him as an almost transcendent figure, capable of uniting disparate factions and transcending the traditional limitations of politics.

It's important to note that this quote reflects one journalist's perspective and should be interpreted within the context of Matthews' own views and the broader political discourse of the time. The quote also raises questions about the role of symbolism and rhetoric in shaping public perceptions of political leaders, as well as the tension between national identity and global citizenship in contemporary politics.

In conclusion, Chris Matthews' quote captures a thought-provoking comparison between the leadership styles of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. The quote highlights the contrasting approaches of these two presidents and raises important questions about the intersection of national identity, global leadership, and the perception of political figures. While Reagan's emphasis on American exceptionalism and Obama's focus on global inclusivity are distinct, both approaches have shaped the way these presidents are remembered and their legacies in American history.