Meaning: This quote by George Mead, a prominent American philosopher, delves into the nature of intelligence and the concept of self. Mead was a leading figure in the field of social psychology and philosophy, and his work has had a significant impact on the understanding of the self and society. In this quote, Mead makes a thought-provoking comparison between the intelligence of lower forms of animal life and human intelligence, suggesting that they both do not involve a self.

Mead's statement challenges the traditional understanding of intelligence, particularly in relation to the concept of self. The idea that lower forms of animal life may exhibit intelligence without a sense of self raises questions about the nature of consciousness and cognition. It also prompts reflection on the human experience and the role of self-awareness in intelligence.

In the context of lower forms of animal life, Mead's assertion suggests that these creatures may demonstrate behavioral patterns and problem-solving abilities without possessing a fully developed self-awareness. This aligns with scientific understanding of animal behavior, which acknowledges the cognitive capacities of various species while also recognizing the differences in self-awareness and consciousness among different organisms.

When considering human intelligence, Mead's statement challenges the notion that all forms of intelligence are inherently linked to a sense of self. This perspective invites contemplation of the diverse ways in which intelligence manifests in human behavior and cognition. It also raises questions about the relationship between intelligence, self-awareness, and social interaction.

Mead's work often explored the interconnectedness of the individual and society, and this quote can be interpreted in that light as well. In the context of human intelligence, the absence of a self in certain manifestations of intelligence may point to the ways in which individuals are influenced by their social and cultural environments. It suggests that intelligence is not solely an individual attribute, but is shaped and expressed within the broader context of social interaction and collective experience.

From a philosophical standpoint, Mead's quote resonates with discussions about the nature of consciousness and the self. It challenges the assumption that intelligence is inseparable from selfhood and invites consideration of alternative perspectives on cognition and behavior. This quote serves as a reminder of the complex and multifaceted nature of intelligence, prompting further exploration of the relationship between intelligence, self-awareness, and the broader social and biological contexts in which they operate.

In conclusion, George Mead's quote about the intelligence of lower forms of animal life and human intelligence provides a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of intelligence and the concept of self. It challenges traditional assumptions about the inseparability of intelligence and self-awareness, inviting contemplation of the diverse manifestations of intelligence in both non-human and human contexts. Mead's work continues to inspire philosophical inquiry and contributes to ongoing discussions about the nature of consciousness, cognition, and the interconnectedness of individuals and society.