Meaning: John Milius, a renowned American screenwriter and film director, made a thought-provoking statement when he reflected on the changing perceptions of his work. In this quote, he expresses his surprise and perplexity at the transformation of some of his movies from being harshly criticized to being revered as classics. This statement sheds light on the complex and often unpredictable nature of public and critical reception of art and highlights the evolving appreciation of creative works over time.

Milius' remark resonates with the experiences of many artists and filmmakers whose works have undergone a similar transformation in public perception. It raises questions about the criteria by which a piece of art is judged and the factors that influence its reception. It also prompts us to consider the role of time in shaping our understanding and evaluation of creative endeavors.

The quote is a reminder that the initial reception of a movie or any work of art does not necessarily determine its lasting impact or significance. Many factors, such as cultural shifts, changing audience sensibilities, and evolving critical perspectives, can contribute to a reevaluation of a film's legacy. Milius' observation serves as a testament to the fluid and subjective nature of artistic appreciation.

Milius' own career is a testament to the fluctuations of critical reception. As a director and screenwriter, he has been associated with films that have elicited strong reactions, both positive and negative. One of his most famous works, "Apocalypse Now," initially faced considerable backlash and was deemed a controversial and polarizing film. However, over time, it has garnered widespread acclaim and is now regarded as a cinematic masterpiece. This evolution in perception exemplifies the phenomenon that Milius alludes to in his quote.

The quote also invites contemplation on the concept of a "classic" and what it signifies in the realm of cinema. The designation of a film as a classic is often indicative of its enduring impact, cultural relevance, and artistic merit. It implies that the work transcends its original context and continues to resonate with audiences across generations. Milius' observation underscores the fluidity of this classification and the potential for films to be reassessed and redefined as classics over time.

Moreover, Milius' quote prompts us to consider the role of hindsight in shaping our understanding of art. It suggests that our perspective on a film can be influenced by historical context and retrospective analysis. As societal attitudes and values evolve, our interpretation of a film's themes, messages, and cultural significance may also change. This highlights the dynamic nature of cinematic appreciation and the ongoing dialogue between a film and its audience.

In conclusion, John Milius' quote encapsulates the intriguing phenomenon of films that have undergone a shift in critical perception, evolving from initial criticism to eventual recognition as classics. It serves as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of artistic appreciation and the transformative power of time. Milius' own experiences in the film industry add depth to his reflection, underscoring the unpredictable trajectory of a film's legacy. Ultimately, his quote invites us to contemplate the ever-changing landscape of cinematic interpretation and the enduring allure of works that stand the test of time.