Meaning: This quote by Edmund Barton, an Australian politician who served as the first Prime Minister of Australia, touches on the debate between denominational and public school systems. The quote highlights the fundamental difference between the two systems and presents a perspective on how they should be treated. To understand the significance of this quote, it is important to examine the historical context of education systems and the implications of denominational and public schools.

Denominational schools are educational institutions that are affiliated with a specific religious denomination or faith. These schools often incorporate religious teachings and values into their curriculum, and they may receive funding and support from their respective religious organizations. On the other hand, the public school system is designed to provide education that is free from religious affiliation, funded and managed by the government, and open to all students regardless of their religious background.

Barton's quote suggests that the approach to supporting denominational schools is one of actively reinforcing and promoting their existence, while the public school system is characterized by a policy of non-interference and allowing them to operate independently. This distinction reflects the broader debate about the role of religion in education and the balance between religious freedom and secularism within the education system.

One interpretation of Barton's quote is that he is advocating for a hands-off approach to denominational schools, implying that they should be allowed to thrive independently without excessive interference or support from the government. This perspective aligns with the principle of religious freedom and the belief that individuals should have the right to choose the type of education that aligns with their religious beliefs.

On the other hand, Barton's quote can also be seen as a critique of the preferential treatment or bolstering up of denominational schools over the public school system. This interpretation raises questions about the allocation of resources and support for different types of schools, and it reflects concerns about the potential for inequality and discrimination within the education system based on religious affiliations.

In the context of Australia, where Barton was a key figure in shaping the nation's early policies and institutions, the quote may also be viewed through the lens of the historical relationship between the government and religious organizations. The issue of state support for denominational schools versus the promotion of secular public education has been a recurring theme in Australian education policy.

Barton's quote invites reflection on the broader implications of these different approaches to education. It raises questions about the role of religion in the public sphere, the impact of government policies on educational diversity, and the principles of equality and inclusivity within the education system.

In conclusion, Edmund Barton's quote encapsulates the contrasting approaches to denominational and public school systems, highlighting the tension between actively supporting religiously affiliated schools and allowing for a more hands-off approach. The quote invites us to consider the implications of these different approaches and the broader principles that underpin the education system. It reflects the ongoing debate about the relationship between religion and education, the role of the state in supporting different types of schools, and the pursuit of equality and diversity within the education system.