Meaning: The quote by Samuel Morison, a renowned historian, expresses his skepticism about the value of courses on historical methodology. In this statement, Morison asserts that such courses are not worth the time they consume and declares that he will never offer one himself. Furthermore, he criticizes his colleagues who do teach historical methodology for not exemplifying their methods by producing written work. This quote sheds light on Morison's perspective on the teaching and practice of historical methodology and raises important questions about the role of such courses in the study of history.

Historical methodology encompasses the techniques, approaches, and principles that historians employ to investigate and interpret the past. It involves the critical examination of primary sources, the evaluation of historical evidence, the construction of narratives, and the application of various theoretical frameworks. Courses on historical methodology are designed to familiarize students with these essential tools and concepts, providing them with the analytical skills and knowledge necessary to engage in historical research and writing.

Morison's assertion that courses on historical methodology are not worth the time they take up challenges the traditional view of the importance of such education. It suggests that he may have had reservations about the effectiveness of these courses in preparing students for historical scholarship. Morison's own background as a historian, particularly his experiences in researching and writing historical works, likely informed his perspective on the value of historical methodology courses.

The statement also highlights Morison's decision to refrain from teaching such courses himself. This could be interpreted as a reflection of his belief that the practical aspects of historical methodology are best learned through hands-on experience and individual research rather than formal instruction. Morison's skepticism about the pedagogical value of historical methodology courses may stem from his belief that the craft of historical inquiry is best honed through active engagement with primary sources and the process of historical writing.

Additionally, Morison's criticism of his colleagues who teach historical methodology for not exemplifying their methods by writing anything raises important questions about the relationship between teaching and practice in the field of history. It suggests that Morison viewed the act of producing written historical work as a fundamental aspect of historical methodology. By implying that his colleagues' failure to write may compromise the credibility of their methods, Morison underscores the significance of historical writing as a means of demonstrating the application of sound methodological practices.

In considering Morison's quote, it is important to acknowledge the evolving nature of historical methodology and the diverse approaches taken by historians in their research and writing. While Morison's perspective reflects a certain skepticism towards formal instruction in historical methodology, it is essential to recognize that the study of historical methodology continues to be a vital component of historical education and scholarship. Historical methodology courses play a crucial role in cultivating critical thinking skills, research abilities, and an understanding of the complexities of interpreting the past.

Moreover, the quote prompts consideration of the broader debates within the historical profession regarding the teaching and practice of historical methodology. It raises questions about the most effective ways to impart methodological skills to students and the extent to which practical experience and theoretical instruction complement each other in the study of history. Morison's viewpoint invites historians and educators to reflect on the balance between theory and practice in historical methodology education and to critically evaluate the objectives and outcomes of such courses.

In conclusion, Samuel Morison's quote about the value of courses on historical methodology offers insight into his perspective on the teaching and practice of historical methodology. While his skepticism may challenge conventional views on the importance of such courses, it also prompts valuable discussions about the role of historical methodology in historical education and scholarship. Ultimately, Morison's quote encourages historians and educators to critically examine the methods by which historical methodology is taught and to consider the broader implications of methodological training in the study of history.