Meaning: This quote by Dick Morris addresses the concept of idealism in relation to national interest and foreign policy. It suggests that an idealistic approach that fails to differentiate between areas where the national interest of a country is directly impacted and those where it is not, ultimately does not serve the best interests of the nation. Instead, it may lead to weariness and disillusionment, particularly in the aftermath of significant historical events such as the Versailles Treaty, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.

In essence, the quote emphasizes the importance of a pragmatic and nuanced approach to foreign policy and national interest. It highlights the potential negative consequences of an overly idealistic foreign policy that does not prioritize the specific areas and issues that directly affect a country's well-being and security.

The mention of the post-Versailles, post-Korea, and post-Vietnam eras contextualizes the quote within the broader historical and geopolitical landscape. The Versailles Treaty, signed in 1919 at the end of World War I, is often criticized for its punitive terms towards Germany, contributing to the conditions that led to the outbreak of World War II. The Korean War (1950-1953) and the Vietnam War (1955-1975) were protracted and controversial conflicts that resulted in significant loss of life and resources for the United States.

These historical references serve to underscore the enduring impact of foreign policy decisions on the national psyche and mood. The weariness mentioned in the quote suggests a collective exhaustion or disillusionment with prolonged military engagements and idealistic pursuits that may not align with tangible national interests.

Moreover, the quote implies that a myopic or indiscriminate idealism in foreign policy can lead to a disconnect between the government's actions and the sentiments of the populace. This can erode public trust and confidence in the government's ability to effectively prioritize and safeguard the nation's interests on the global stage.

In the context of contemporary international relations, the quote invites reflection on the ongoing debates and challenges surrounding foreign policy decision-making. It raises questions about the balance between idealistic aspirations, such as promoting democracy and human rights globally, and the pragmatic pursuit of national security, economic stability, and strategic interests.

The notion of distinguishing between areas where national interest is directly relevant and those where it is more remote also speaks to the complexity of modern geopolitics. In an interconnected world, issues and events in distant regions can have ripple effects that impact a nation's security, economy, and values. Navigating this complexity requires a discerning and strategic approach that considers both immediate national interests and broader global dynamics.

Overall, this quote by Dick Morris provokes thoughtful consideration of the interplay between idealism, national interest, and the historical context of foreign policy. It serves as a reminder of the enduring significance of past experiences in shaping contemporary perspectives on international relations and the imperative of crafting foreign policy that effectively serves the best interests of the nation while acknowledging the lessons of history.