Meaning: This quote by Ferdinand Mount, a British writer and former editor of the Times Literary Supplement, provides insight into the nature of great politicians and their propensity to cling to their beliefs, even in the face of opposition and criticism. The quote suggests that despite their capabilities and achievements, politicians are fallible and can be resistant to admitting their mistakes.

Great politicians are often characterized by their charisma, leadership abilities, and vision for the future. They possess the skills to inspire and lead, and they are adept at navigating complex political landscapes to enact change. However, the quote reminds us that even these remarkable individuals are not immune to making errors in judgment or policy decisions.

The notion that great politicians are "always liable to be wrong about something" acknowledges the inherent human fallibility that transcends their political prowess. This vulnerability to error is a reminder that no matter how capable or influential a politician may be, they are subject to making misjudgments and mistakes. This serves as a humbling realization, emphasizing that no one is infallible, regardless of their status or position.

Furthermore, the quote highlights the psychological aspect of being a politician. It suggests that the more people challenge or criticize a politician's stance or decision, the more entrenched they become in defending their position. This behavior speaks to the concept of cognitive dissonance, where individuals experience discomfort when confronted with information that contradicts their beliefs, leading them to defend their existing views even more staunchly. This insight into the psychology of politicians sheds light on the complexities of leadership and the challenges of maintaining open-mindedness in the face of opposition.

Mount's quote also prompts reflection on the nature of power and influence. Politicians, especially those considered "great," often wield significant authority and command widespread attention. With such influence comes the temptation to resist acknowledging faults or errors, as doing so may be perceived as a sign of weakness. The quote suggests that the more people challenge a politician's viewpoint, the more resolute they become in defending it, perhaps as a means of preserving their authority and credibility.

In the context of political discourse and decision-making, this quote serves as a cautionary reminder about the potential pitfalls of unwavering conviction in the face of dissenting opinions. It underscores the importance of humility, receptiveness to feedback, and the willingness to reassess one's positions in light of new information or perspectives.

Ultimately, Mount's quote encapsulates the complex interplay between leadership, fallibility, and the psychological dynamics of defending one's beliefs. It offers a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of great politicians and the challenges they face in reconciling their authority with the potential for error and resistance to criticism.