Meaning: The quote by Gilbert Murray reflects on the nature of the Greek language and its fundamental differences from modern languages, particularly English. Murray, a renowned classical scholar and diplomat, highlights the vibrancy and fluidity of the Greek language, contrasting it with the structured and rule-bound nature of contemporary languages. In this analysis, Murray emphasizes the organic development of Greek as a living language, free from the rigid constraints of grammar and dictionary definitions.

Greek, as Murray suggests, was a "live language," meaning that it was actively spoken and used in everyday communication. Unlike modern languages that are often standardized and regulated by grammar rules, Greek in its heyday was a dynamic and evolving medium of expression. This fluidity allowed for a certain spontaneity and creativity in the use of language, unconstrained by the rigid grammatical conventions that are prevalent in contemporary linguistic practices.

Murray's assertion that Greek was "unconscious of grammar" alludes to the idea that the ancient speakers of the language did not adhere to a formalized set of grammatical rules as modern speakers do. Rather than being bound by the prescriptive regulations of grammar, the ancient Greeks would have used the language in a more intuitive and natural manner, guided by their innate understanding of its structure and rhythm.

Furthermore, the phrase "dominated by definitions and trained upon dictionaries" underscores the contrast between the Greek language and contemporary languages like English. Murray implies that modern languages are heavily reliant on definitions and dictionaries, emphasizing the prescriptive nature of linguistic rules and the importance given to standardization and uniformity. In contrast, Greek was characterized by a more organic and instinctive approach to language usage, unencumbered by the constraints of formal definitions and dictionary-based learning.

Murray's perspective sheds light on the unique qualities of the Greek language and the cultural context in which it flourished. His analysis invites us to reconsider our understanding of language as a dynamic and evolving system of communication, shaped by the cultural and historical context in which it is used.

In conclusion, Gilbert Murray's quote offers a thought-provoking insight into the nature of the Greek language, highlighting its dynamic and unconstrained character in contrast to modern, rule-bound languages. By emphasizing the vitality and spontaneity of Greek as a living language, Murray encourages us to appreciate the rich cultural and historical context that shaped the development of this ancient language. His analysis challenges us to reconsider our assumptions about language and invites us to explore the diverse and evolving nature of linguistic expression.