Meaning: This quote by Hassan Nasrallah, the Secretary-General of the Lebanese political and paramilitary organization Hezbollah, reflects the disillusionment and frustration of a group of people who had previously engaged in negotiations, only to find that these negotiations failed to deliver on their minimum rights. The word "intifada" in Arabic translates to "uprising" or "shaking off," and is often used in the context of Palestinian resistance against Israeli occupation. In this context, Nasrallah is suggesting that those who previously engaged in negotiations have now taken a more confrontational and assertive stance, as they feel that negotiations have not yielded the desired outcomes.

The quote reflects a broader theme of disillusionment with the negotiation process and a shift towards more direct and confrontational methods of seeking justice or redress. It speaks to the complexities and challenges of negotiation processes, particularly in the context of protracted conflicts and deeply entrenched grievances.

In the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, negotiations have been a central feature of efforts to reach a peaceful resolution. However, the failure of negotiations to deliver tangible improvements in the lives of Palestinians, coupled with ongoing Israeli occupation and settlement expansion, has led to widespread frustration and a sense of betrayal among many Palestinians. This frustration has, at times, manifested in the form of violent uprisings or intifadas, as people seek to assert their rights and resist what they perceive as unjust and oppressive conditions.

The quote also highlights the limitations of negotiations in addressing fundamental grievances and structural injustices. It suggests that for some, negotiations have not provided a viable path towards securing their basic rights and dignity, leading to a reevaluation of tactics and strategies for achieving their goals.

Nasrallah's words may also reflect a broader skepticism towards the efficacy of negotiations in the face of entrenched power imbalances and asymmetries. In situations where one party holds significantly more power and leverage, negotiations can often be perceived as inherently unequal and tilted in favor of the stronger party. This can create a sense of futility and disillusionment among those who feel marginalized and disempowered by the negotiation process.

Furthermore, the quote underscores the deeply personal and emotional dimensions of negotiations and conflict resolution. It speaks to the experiences of individuals and communities who have invested hope and faith in the negotiation process, only to be disappointed by its failure to address their core concerns. This emotional dimension is crucial for understanding the dynamics of conflict and the motivations driving individuals and groups to pursue alternative avenues for achieving justice and redress.

In conclusion, Hassan Nasrallah's quote captures the frustration and disillusionment of those who have engaged in negotiations but found them to be inadequate in addressing their fundamental rights. It reflects a broader skepticism towards the efficacy of negotiations in the face of entrenched power imbalances and structural injustices. The quote underscores the deeply personal and emotional dimensions of negotiations and conflict resolution, highlighting the complexities and challenges inherent in seeking peaceful resolutions to protracted conflicts.