Meaning: The quote "When we were engaged in the problems of survival we had no time to have anything to do with culture" by Nursultan Nazarbayev, a prominent politician, encapsulates a profound insight into the relationship between the pursuit of survival and the development of culture. Nursultan Nazarbayev, the first President of Kazakhstan, highlights the prioritization of basic human needs over cultural pursuits. This quote reflects the historical and socio-economic context of many societies, where the struggle for survival often takes precedence over the cultivation and preservation of cultural practices.

In many parts of the world, particularly in less developed or conflict-ridden regions, the challenges of securing basic necessities such as food, shelter, and safety have historically consumed the majority of people's time and energy. In such circumstances, the luxury of engaging with cultural activities, arts, and intellectual pursuits becomes a distant aspiration. This could be due to the harsh realities of poverty, war, or environmental challenges that demand immediate attention and resources. As a result, the nurturing and transmission of cultural traditions, artistic expressions, and intellectual discourse are often marginalized or disrupted.

The quote also underscores the transformative impact of societal progress and stability on the cultivation of culture. As societies evolve and achieve greater stability, there is a gradual shift from a focus on mere survival to the embrace and development of cultural practices. This transition enables communities to invest in education, the arts, and heritage preservation, fostering a rich tapestry of cultural expressions. It is during these periods of relative calm and prosperity that individuals and communities can explore, celebrate, and contribute to the diversity of human culture.

Furthermore, the quote raises important questions about the complex interplay between survival and culture. It prompts us to consider the ways in which cultural traditions and values can, in turn, contribute to the resilience and adaptability of communities facing existential challenges. Cultural practices, rituals, and storytelling often serve as sources of strength, identity, and solidarity during times of hardship, providing a sense of continuity and purpose amid adversity. In this sense, culture can be both a product of survival and a source of sustenance in the face of adversity.

Nursultan Nazarbayev's quote also invites reflection on the global disparities that shape the relationship between survival and culture. While some societies enjoy relative affluence and stability, allowing for the flourishing of diverse cultural expressions, others continue to grapple with the urgent demands of survival, leaving little room for the cultivation of cultural heritage. This disparity underscores the importance of addressing socio-economic inequalities and creating conditions that enable all individuals and communities to engage with and contribute to the richness of human culture.

In conclusion, Nursultan Nazarbayev's quote offers a thought-provoking perspective on the dynamic interplay between survival and culture. It reminds us of the profound impact of historical, social, and economic factors on the prioritization of basic needs over cultural pursuits. It also highlights the transformative potential of stability and progress in nurturing and preserving cultural traditions. Ultimately, the quote encourages us to recognize the intrinsic value of culture in shaping our identities, resilience, and collective human experience.