Meaning: This quote by Enid Nemy sheds light on the power dynamics and hierarchies that exist within organizations, even in supposedly egalitarian settings like the United Nations. The notion that the design of the UN building was intended to eliminate corner offices, traditionally associated with higher status, suggests a conscious effort to create a more egalitarian work environment. However, Nemy points out that the presence of glass in individual offices serves as a subtle indicator of rank, contradicting the supposed absence of corner offices.

The United Nations, as a symbol of global cooperation and diplomacy, strives to embody principles of equality and fairness. The idea that the building was designed to eliminate corner offices reflects an intention to create a level playing field and reduce hierarchical structures within the organization. However, Nemy's observation about the expanse of glass in individual offices being a "dead giveaway" of rank highlights the persistence of subtle indicators of hierarchy, even in an environment that aims to be free of overt displays of status.

The significance of the number of windows in an office as a symbol of rank is a thought-provoking concept. The presence of five windows is seen as an indicator of excellence, suggesting a higher status or seniority within the organization. On the other hand, having only one window is considered less favorable in this context, implying a lower rank or less prestigious position. This observation underscores how even seemingly neutral architectural features can carry implicit messages about status and power within an organizational setting.

The quote also prompts us to consider the broader implications of workplace design and its impact on organizational culture. The layout and design of office spaces can convey unspoken messages about status, hierarchy, and power dynamics. The presence of corner offices, traditionally associated with top executives, has long been seen as a symbol of power and authority. By purportedly eliminating corner offices, the UN sought to challenge this traditional hierarchy. However, Nemy's observation about the role of windows in individual offices suggests that subtle indicators of status and rank persist, challenging the notion of a truly egalitarian workplace.

This quote invites us to critically examine the ways in which organizational hierarchies manifest themselves, even in environments that strive for equality and fairness. It raises important questions about the impact of physical space on workplace dynamics and the extent to which architecture and design can either reinforce or challenge traditional power structures. Furthermore, it serves as a reminder that symbols of hierarchy and status can be deeply ingrained, often transcending explicit efforts to create more equitable organizational environments.

In conclusion, Enid Nemy's quote offers a thought-provoking commentary on the presence of hierarchy and status within organizations, even in contexts that aim to be egalitarian. By highlighting the significance of office design and the subtle indicators of rank within the United Nations, the quote prompts us to consider the complex interplay between architecture, hierarchy, and organizational culture. It serves as a reminder of the enduring nature of power dynamics and the need for continued reflection on how physical space shapes our understanding of status and authority in the workplace.