Meaning: The quote "They want the Olympics. We ought to make sure they don't get the Olympics." by George Nethercutt, a former U.S. Representative from Washington, reflects a sentiment that is relevant in the context of international sports and politics. This quote is particularly pertinent in the debate surrounding the hosting of major sporting events, such as the Olympic Games, and the political and diplomatic implications associated with these events.

The Olympics, as one of the most significant and widely watched international sports events, have historically been sought after by countries and cities as a means of showcasing their capabilities, promoting tourism, and gaining prestige on the global stage. However, the process of bidding for and hosting the Olympics is often mired in controversy, as it involves significant financial investments, infrastructure development, and complex political considerations.

Nethercutt's quote suggests a strategic approach to international competition, indicating that there may be instances where it is in the best interest of certain entities to prevent others from hosting the Olympics. This could be driven by various factors, including geopolitical rivalries, concerns about human rights violations, or economic considerations. In recent years, there have been instances where calls to boycott or oppose certain countries' bids to host the Olympics have emerged due to political or ethical reasons.

One notable example is the controversy surrounding the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Leading up to the games, there were widespread debates and protests related to China's human rights record, particularly in the context of its policies in Tibet and its restrictions on freedom of expression. Some political figures and advocacy groups called for a boycott of the Beijing Olympics, while others argued for using the games as an opportunity to engage China on human rights issues.

Similarly, the selection of host cities for the Olympics can become embroiled in political maneuvering and international relations. The bidding process often involves intense lobbying efforts by candidate cities, with various countries vying for the opportunity to showcase their capabilities on the global stage. This competition can be influenced by diplomatic relations, economic considerations, and the desire to project soft power.

In this context, Nethercutt's quote may be interpreted as a reflection of the competitive and strategic nature of international sports diplomacy. It acknowledges the significance of the Olympics as a coveted event that holds both symbolic and practical value for host countries, while also highlighting the potential for political considerations to influence the process.

Furthermore, the quote raises broader questions about the intersection of sports and politics. The Olympics, as a symbol of international cooperation and athletic excellence, are inherently political in nature. They provide a platform for countries to assert their influence, showcase their cultures, and pursue diplomatic objectives. At the same time, the games can also become a stage for political protests, demonstrations, and statements against perceived injustices or violations of human rights.

In conclusion, George Nethercutt's quote encapsulates the complex and multifaceted relationship between sports, politics, and diplomacy, particularly in the context of the Olympic Games. It underscores the strategic considerations and competition that underlie the bidding process for hosting the Olympics, as well as the broader geopolitical implications associated with major international sporting events. This quote invites reflection on the ways in which sports can be intertwined with political agendas and power dynamics on the global stage.