Meaning: Albert Jay Nock, an American libertarian author, and social critic, expressed this quote in his book "Memoirs of a Superfluous Man," published in 1943. The quote reflects Nock's philosophical perspective on the nature of morality and the significance of ethical considerations in human affairs.

Nock's statement challenges the conventional focus on assigning blame or determining the correctness of individuals' actions and instead directs attention to the broader ethical principles at play. In essence, Nock argues that the more pertinent issue lies not in identifying who is right or wrong, but in understanding what constitutes right and wrong behavior in a given context.

This perspective aligns with ethical philosophy, particularly deontological and consequentialist theories, which emphasize the importance of examining the moral principles and consequences of actions. Nock's emphasis on the "what" rather than the "who" suggests a commitment to evaluating actions based on their ethical implications and broader societal impact rather than engaging in mere judgment or condemnation of individuals.

The quote also reflects Nock's intellectual independence and his inclination to focus on fundamental principles rather than being swayed by partisan or personal considerations. Nock was known for his critical analysis of political and social institutions, and his quote can be seen as a call to transcend the pettiness of personal disputes and instead engage in principled ethical reflection.

Furthermore, Nock's emphasis on the question of "what is right and what is wrong" underscores the universal and timeless nature of ethical inquiry. By prioritizing the exploration of ethical principles, Nock encourages individuals to engage in deep reflection on the fundamental values that guide human behavior across cultures and generations.

Nock's quote also resonates with contemporary discussions on morality, ethics, and personal responsibility. In an era marked by complex moral dilemmas and polarizing debates, Nock's emphasis on evaluating the ethical dimensions of actions offers a valuable perspective. By shifting the focus from individual culpability to ethical considerations, Nock's quote invites individuals to engage in more meaningful and constructive discussions about the moral implications of their choices.

In conclusion, Albert Jay Nock's quote presents a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of morality and ethical inquiry. By elevating the question of "what is right and what is wrong" above the mere determination of individual correctness, Nock challenges individuals to engage in principled ethical reflection and consider the broader implications of their actions. This quote continues to inspire philosophical discussions and ethical reflections, inviting individuals to transcend the narrow confines of personal disputes and instead grapple with the timeless and universal questions of morality.