Meaning: The quote "To my mind, what we ought to have maintained from the beginning was the strictest neutrality. If we had done this, I do not believe we would have been on the verge of war at the present time" by George Norris, a prominent American politician, reflects his belief in the importance of maintaining strict neutrality in international affairs to avoid being drawn into conflicts. This quote captures Norris's perspective on foreign policy and the potential consequences of deviating from a position of neutrality.

George William Norris (1861-1944) was a U.S. politician who served as a U.S. Representative and Senator from the state of Nebraska. He was known for his progressive and independent views, often advocating for measures to support the common people and limit the power of big business and political machines. Norris was also a vocal critic of U.S. involvement in World War I and a proponent of neutrality in international conflicts.

In the context of the quote, Norris is expressing his belief that strict neutrality should have been maintained from the beginning, likely referring to the period leading up to a specific conflict or war. He suggests that if the country had adhered to a policy of strict neutrality, the current situation on the verge of war could have been avoided. This reflects his conviction that involvement in international conflicts can be detrimental and that maintaining a neutral stance can help prevent escalation to war.

Norris's perspective on strict neutrality aligns with his broader political philosophy, which emphasized non-intervention and a focus on domestic issues. He believed that the United States should prioritize its own interests and avoid entanglement in foreign conflicts unless absolutely necessary for national defense or security. This stance was informed by his skepticism of the motives behind U.S. involvement in global affairs and a desire to prevent the country from being drawn into conflicts that did not directly threaten its interests.

The quote also resonates with debates about foreign policy and the role of the United States in international affairs. Throughout its history, the U.S. has grappled with the question of when and how to engage with the rest of the world, and the issue of neutrality versus intervention has been a recurring theme. Norris's views reflect a strain of isolationism and non-interventionism that has influenced American foreign policy at various points in time.

Additionally, the quote raises questions about the potential consequences of deviating from a policy of strict neutrality. Norris implies that a departure from neutrality may have contributed to the current situation on the verge of war, suggesting that a different approach could have prevented this outcome. This speaks to the complex and often unpredictable nature of international relations and the impact of foreign policy decisions on the prospects for peace and conflict.

In conclusion, George Norris's quote underscores his belief in the importance of maintaining strict neutrality in international affairs and its potential role in preventing conflicts. His perspective reflects broader debates about U.S. foreign policy and the balance between neutrality and intervention. By advocating for strict neutrality, Norris sought to promote a foreign policy approach that prioritized avoiding entanglement in foreign conflicts and prioritizing the interests of the United States.