Meaning: The quote by Olusegun Obasanjo, a prominent Nigerian statesman, delves into the deep-seated motivations behind political disputes and struggles for political advantage. It highlights the dichotomy between the proclaimed dedication to democracy and the underlying driving force of the rule of law. This thought-provoking statement sheds light on the complex interplay between these two fundamental principles and their influence on political dynamics.

In this quote, Obasanjo suggests that the outward display of political fervor and the fervent pursuit of political advantage often stem from a commitment to the rule of law rather than a genuine concern for democracy. This assertion challenges the conventional narrative that political conflicts primarily revolve around ideals of democracy and the advancement of the people's interests. Instead, it posits that the rule of law, with its emphasis on legal frameworks and institutional structures, serves as a significant impetus behind political maneuvering.

The rule of law refers to the principle that all individuals and institutions, including the government, are subject to and accountable under the law. It encompasses the supremacy of law, equality before the law, and the protection of fundamental rights and liberties. While democracy focuses on the people's participation in decision-making and the protection of their rights, the rule of law provides the framework within which democratic processes operate. It ensures that those in power are bound by legal constraints and that the rights of citizens are safeguarded.

Obasanjo's assertion prompts a critical examination of the deeper motivations that underpin political actions and strategies. It suggests that the quest for political advantage and the perpetuation of political disputes are often intertwined with the desire to wield power within the bounds of legal legitimacy. This perspective invites scrutiny of the extent to which political actors prioritize the adherence to legal norms and institutions as a means to achieve their objectives.

Moreover, the quote raises questions about the potential tension between the rule of law and democratic principles. While both are essential components of a just and equitable society, their intersection can give rise to complex challenges. Political actors may exploit legal mechanisms and loopholes to further their interests, potentially undermining the democratic ideals of transparency, accountability, and representation. Conversely, an unwavering commitment to democracy at the expense of legal frameworks could lead to instability and a disregard for the foundational structures that uphold societal order.

In many political contexts, the rule of law is invoked as a safeguard against arbitrary use of power and as a means to ensure the fair and impartial application of legal standards. However, Obasanjo's quote alludes to the possibility that the rule of law can be leveraged to advance political agendas that may not necessarily align with the broader democratic aspirations of the populace. This nuanced interpretation underscores the intricate interplay between legal governance and democratic governance, prompting a deeper exploration of their interdependencies and potential conflicts.

Ultimately, Olusegun Obasanjo's quote serves as a thought-provoking commentary on the underlying dynamics of political strife and competition. It encourages a reevaluation of the motivations that drive political actors and the complex relationship between the rule of law and democratic principles. By delving beneath the surface of political rhetoric, this quote compels us to contemplate the intricate balance between legal frameworks and democratic values in shaping the trajectory of governance and societal progress.

In conclusion, Olusegun Obasanjo's quote offers a compelling insight into the underlying forces that propel political disputes and struggles for political advantage. It prompts a critical examination of the tension between the professed dedication to democracy and the influence of the rule of law as a driving factor in political dynamics. By unpacking the complexities of this relationship, the quote encourages a deeper understanding of the interplay between legal governance and democratic principles in shaping the course of political affairs.