Meaning: This quote from Bob Odenkirk, an American actor, writer, and director, sheds light on the editing process in the film industry and the level of involvement that actors may have in shaping the final product. Odenkirk's statement suggests that he and another individual, presumably David, were not given full access to the editing process for a particular project. However, they were still able to have some influence on the editing through the submission of notes and the ability to review cuts of the film. This insight provides a glimpse into the collaborative nature of filmmaking and the varying degrees of involvement that different individuals may have in the post-production phase.

The editing process in filmmaking is a crucial stage where the raw footage is crafted into a coherent and compelling narrative. It involves the selection and arrangement of shots, as well as the incorporation of sound, visual effects, and other elements to bring the story to life. While directors and editors typically play central roles in this process, the input of other key stakeholders, including actors, can also be valuable in ensuring that the final product aligns with the creative vision and intent of the project.

Odenkirk's reference to being "cut out" of the editing process suggests that he and his colleague were not granted the level of involvement or access that they had hoped for. This situation is not uncommon in the industry, as the extent of actor involvement in post-production can vary widely from project to project. While some actors may have the opportunity to provide input on the editing of their scenes or character portrayal, others may have limited or no involvement in this phase of production.

The fact that Odenkirk mentions being "able to affect it more than not" indicates that, despite the limitations placed on their involvement, he and his colleague were still able to exert some influence on the editing of the project. This highlights the importance of communication and collaboration between filmmakers and actors, even in cases where the actors may not have direct access to the editing room or dailies (raw, unedited footage).

The ability to "send in notes" and "see cuts" suggests that Odenkirk and his colleague were given opportunities to provide feedback and review the progress of the editing process. This demonstrates a degree of engagement and investment in ensuring that their creative input was considered, even if they were not physically present in the editing room. While this level of involvement may not have been as extensive as they had desired, it still allowed them to contribute to the shaping of the final product.

Overall, Odenkirk's quote provides valuable insights into the dynamics of the editing process in filmmaking and the varying levels of involvement that actors may have in shaping the final cut of a film. It highlights the collaborative nature of the industry and the importance of finding ways for key stakeholders, including actors, to contribute to the creative decisions that impact the outcome of the project.