Meaning: The quote provided by Kenzaburo Oe, a renowned Japanese writer and intellectual, reflects on the enduring influence of the old Constitution in Japan despite the implementation of a new one. Oe's thought-provoking statement encapsulates the complex relationship between tradition and modernity, and the ways in which historical legacies continue to shape contemporary societal attitudes and values.

In order to fully understand Oe's quote, it is important to delve into the historical and cultural context of Japan. Following the end of World War II, Japan underwent a significant transformation with the adoption of a new Constitution in 1947. This new Constitution, often referred to as the "peace constitution," was a departure from Japan's pre-war militaristic and authoritarian governance. It enshrined principles of democracy, human rights, and pacifism, marking a profound shift in the country's political landscape.

However, Oe's observation suggests that despite the legal and institutional changes brought about by the new Constitution, elements of the old order continue to exert influence in certain segments of Japanese society. This sentiment of support for the old Constitution reflects a deep-seated attachment to tradition and historical continuity, even in the face of progressive reforms.

One possible interpretation of Oe's quote is that the old Constitution represents a set of values and norms that have persisted over time, shaping the collective consciousness of the Japanese people. This enduring influence may stem from a sense of nostalgia for a bygone era, or a belief in the enduring relevance of certain traditional principles.

Moreover, Oe's quote also alludes to the complexities of societal change and adaptation. While the new Constitution ushered in an era of democratic governance and individual rights, it did not erase the legacy of the past. Historical memory and cultural heritage continue to inform the perspectives and beliefs of individuals and communities, contributing to a nuanced and multifaceted society.

In addition, Oe's quote prompts us to consider the concept of national identity and the ways in which it is shaped by historical narratives and collective memory. The coexistence of the old and new Constitutions in the public consciousness reflects the dynamic interplay between tradition and progress, and the ongoing negotiation of societal values and aspirations.

In conclusion, Kenzaburo Oe's quote encapsulates the enduring influence of the old Constitution in Japan, despite the introduction of a new one. It invites us to reflect on the interplay between tradition and modernity, and the ways in which historical legacies continue to shape contemporary societal attitudes and values. Oe's thought-provoking insight serves as a testament to the complexities of societal change and the enduring significance of historical memory in shaping national identity.