Meaning: The quote provided by Daniel Ortega highlights the complex nature of international relations and the strategic alliances that countries often form to meet their military needs. In this case, the quote refers to the limitations of Cuba's support in building up the speaker's army due to the country's limited capacity to manufacture the necessary armaments in sufficient quantities. As a result, the speaker turned to Algeria and the Soviet Union for support in fulfilling their military requirements.

Cuba's limited capacity to manufacture armaments is likely a reference to the country's historical and economic context. Despite its revolutionary fervor and commitment to supporting leftist movements in other countries, Cuba has faced significant economic challenges, particularly in terms of industrial production. This has constrained the country's ability to fully meet the military needs of its allies, as noted in the quote.

Algeria and the Soviet Union, on the other hand, are presented as alternative sources of support for the speaker's army. Both countries had significant military capabilities and industrial capacities, making them more suitable partners for fulfilling the speaker's armament requirements. The decision to turn to these countries reflects the pragmatic approach to international relations often adopted by states seeking to bolster their military capabilities.

The mention of Algeria is particularly noteworthy, as it underscores the significance of regional alliances and partnerships in meeting military needs. Algeria, like Cuba, had been involved in supporting various revolutionary and leftist movements across the globe. The cooperation between the speaker's army and Algeria likely reflects a shared ideological and strategic alignment, which facilitated the provision of military support.

The reference to the Soviet Union is also significant, given the country's status as a major global power during the time period in which the quote is situated. The Soviet Union was known for its extensive military-industrial complex and its willingness to support various revolutionary and anti-imperialist movements around the world. By seeking support from the Soviet Union, the speaker's army was tapping into a significant source of military expertise and resources.

Overall, the quote sheds light on the complexities of international military support and the strategic considerations that underpin such relationships. It illustrates how countries often need to look beyond ideological affinity and seek practical solutions to meet their military needs. The decision to turn to Algeria and the Soviet Union for support underscores the role of pragmatism and strategic calculation in the pursuit of military objectives.

In conclusion, the quote by Daniel Ortega provides a glimpse into the intricate web of international relations, military support, and strategic decision-making. It highlights the limitations of Cuba's support in meeting the speaker's army's armament requirements and the subsequent recourse to Algeria and the Soviet Union for assistance. This reflects the pragmatic approach to international relations and the strategic alliances that countries often form to address their military needs.