Meaning: This quote by Amos Oz, a renowned Israeli writer, touches upon the idea of cultural values and the perception of Western culture as a marker of sophistication and refinement. Oz, who was born in Jerusalem in 1939, grew up in a society deeply influenced by the clash between traditional Jewish and Western values. His own experiences and observations likely informed his understanding of the cultural hierarchy and the privileging of Western elements in his parents' scale of values.

In many societies, including Israel, there has been a historical tendency to associate Western culture with progress, modernity, and sophistication. This association often stems from the influence of colonial powers and the subsequent global dominance of Western ideas, technologies, and cultural products. As a result, non-Western cultures have frequently been marginalized or undervalued, creating a pervasive bias in favor of Western cultural elements.

Oz's reference to his parents' scale of values suggests that this bias was present in his own upbringing. It reflects a common phenomenon wherein individuals are conditioned to perceive Western cultural attributes as inherently superior or more refined than those from other cultural traditions. This mindset can manifest in various aspects of life, including language, art, literature, fashion, and lifestyle choices, where Western norms and practices are often upheld as benchmarks of cultural sophistication.

However, it is important to recognize the complexity and diversity within Western culture itself, as well as the richness and depth of non-Western cultures. The Western world encompasses a wide range of traditions, histories, and perspectives, and it is not monolithic in its cultural expressions. Similarly, non-Western cultures have their own distinct contributions to the global cultural tapestry, which are equally deserving of appreciation and respect.

Oz's reflection on the cultural hierarchy within his family also prompts us to consider the impact of such attitudes on individual and collective identities. When certain cultural attributes are consistently valorized over others, it can lead to a devaluation of one's own heritage and an internalized sense of inferiority. This can be particularly significant for individuals who belong to marginalized or non-dominant cultural groups, as they may grapple with the pressure to conform to Western standards in order to gain acceptance or validation.

Moreover, the perpetuation of the idea that Western equates to cultured can perpetuate cultural hegemony and limit opportunities for meaningful cross-cultural exchange and dialogue. It can reinforce power imbalances and contribute to the erasure of diverse cultural perspectives, hindering the appreciation of the full spectrum of human creativity and ingenuity.

In light of these considerations, it is essential to critically examine and challenge the notion that Western culture is inherently more cultured or superior. Embracing cultural pluralism and recognizing the value of all cultural traditions can foster greater inclusivity, understanding, and mutual respect. It can also enrich our collective experience by allowing for the exploration and celebration of the myriad ways in which human societies have expressed their creativity, knowledge, and wisdom.

Amos Oz's poignant observation offers a thought-provoking lens through which to contemplate the complex interplay of cultural values, perceptions, and biases. It invites us to engage in meaningful conversations about the diverse tapestry of human cultures and the importance of cultivating a more inclusive and equitable approach to cultural appreciation and recognition.