Meaning: The quote by Amos Oz, an Israeli writer, reflects the complex and often contentious dynamics of international politics, particularly in the context of the Middle East. This quote highlights the pervasive tensions and deep-seated divisions that have historically characterized the relationships between various countries in the region, particularly with regards to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The statement alludes to the hypothetical scenario of Arab nations proposing a draft resolution that seeks to blame Israel for a natural disaster, in this case, the earthquake in Iran. Oz suggests that such a resolution would likely garner majority support from Arab nations, but would ultimately be met with a veto from the United States, while Britain and France might abstain from voting. This hypothetical situation serves as a poignant commentary on the intricate web of political alliances, power dynamics, and historical animosities that shape international diplomacy in the Middle East.

Oz's assertion that the U.S. would veto the resolution aligns with the well-established stance of the United States as a staunch ally of Israel. Over the years, the U.S. has consistently provided unwavering support for Israel, both politically and militarily. This support has been a source of contention and criticism from many Arab and Muslim-majority countries, who often view the U.S. as an enabler of Israeli actions and policies that they perceive as unjust or oppressive.

Furthermore, the mention of Britain and France potentially abstaining from the vote underscores the complexities of international relations and the diverse positions held by different nations regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While these European countries may not align as closely with the U.S. and Israel as some other Western nations do, their position on the issue is nuanced and can vary based on specific circumstances and diplomatic considerations.

The quote also sheds light on the broader geopolitical dynamics at play in the Middle East, where longstanding rivalries and geopolitical interests often intersect with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The region's history is marked by a complex tapestry of alliances, animosities, and power struggles that continue to influence diplomatic efforts and international relations.

In addition to its geopolitical implications, the quote also speaks to the broader themes of international diplomacy and the challenges of achieving consensus and resolution in the face of deeply entrenched conflicts. The hypothetical scenario presented by Oz serves as a stark reminder of the formidable obstacles that must be navigated in the pursuit of peace and stability in the Middle East.

Overall, Amos Oz's quote encapsulates the intricate web of political complexities, historical animosities, and diplomatic challenges that define the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its broader impact on international relations in the Middle East. It underscores the deep-seated divisions and entrenched positions that continue to shape the region's political landscape, while also highlighting the formidable obstacles to achieving meaningful progress and resolution in the midst of such complex and contentious dynamics.