And what do Democrats stand for, if they are so ready to defame concerned citizens as the "mob" - a word betraying a Marie Antoinette delusion of superiority to ordinary mortals. I thought my party was populist, attentive to the needs and wishes of those outside the power structure. And as a product of the 1960s, I thought the Democratic party was passionately committed to freedom of thought and speech.
Profession: Author
Topics: Power, Thought, Superiority, Delusion, Democrats, Freedom, Needs, Party, Speech, Wishes, Word,
Wallpaper of quote
Meaning:
This quote by Camille Paglia addresses the perception of the Democratic party and its treatment of the opposition. Paglia criticizes the Democrats for labeling concerned citizens as a "mob" and accuses them of betraying a sense of superiority and elitism reminiscent of Marie Antoinette. She expresses disappointment in her belief that the Democratic party was meant to be populist and attentive to the needs of ordinary citizens, as well as being committed to freedom of thought and speech. Paglia's words reflect a sense of disillusionment with the direction of the party and a perceived departure from its historical values.
The quote captures a sentiment that has been echoed by some individuals who feel that the Democratic party has lost touch with its roots and the principles it once stood for. It raises important questions about how political parties engage with dissent and critique, as well as their commitments to inclusivity and freedom of expression. Paglia's reference to the term "mob" suggests a dismissal of legitimate concerns and opposition, which can be seen as an attempt to delegitimize and silence dissenting voices.
The mention of Marie Antoinette, the last queen of France before the French Revolution, is significant in highlighting the perceived disconnect between the ruling elite and the ordinary citizens. Marie Antoinette is often associated with a callous disregard for the suffering of the common people, famously attributed to her apocryphal statement "Let them eat cake." By invoking this historical figure, Paglia draws a parallel between the elitism of the Democratic party and the out-of-touch attitudes of the ruling class in the past.
Paglia's identification as a product of the 1960s is also noteworthy, as it reflects a specific era of social and political upheaval in the United States. The 1960s saw the rise of countercultural movements, civil rights activism, and a push for greater freedom of expression. Paglia's reference to this period underscores her belief that the Democratic party was once aligned with these values and suggests a perceived departure from them.
The quote also highlights the tension within the Democratic party between different ideological factions. While some may argue that the party has moved towards a more progressive and inclusive stance, others, like Paglia, feel that it has become disconnected from the concerns of ordinary citizens and has adopted a more elitist and dismissive attitude towards dissenting voices.
In conclusion, Camille Paglia's quote sheds light on the evolving identity and values of the Democratic party, as well as the challenges it faces in navigating dissent and critique. It prompts reflection on the role of political parties in engaging with opposition and the importance of upholding principles of inclusivity and freedom of expression. Whether one agrees with Paglia's assessment or not, her words invite a critical examination of the Democratic party and its relationship to the broader populace.