Meaning: This quote by Claude Pepper, a prominent American politician, captures a fundamental truth about the nature of political power and the potential pitfalls that come with it. In essence, Pepper is cautioning politicians against falling into the trap of arrogance and self-importance that can arise from their positions of authority. By drawing a distinction between being "appointed" and being "anointed," he is highlighting the difference between being chosen for a role based on merit or democratic processes, and believing that one has a divine or unquestionable right to wield power.

At its core, this quote serves as a reminder to politicians that they are ultimately public servants, entrusted with the responsibility of representing the interests of their constituents and upholding the principles of democracy. The notion of being "appointed" carries with it the idea of being selected for a specific purpose or role, often through a process that involves accountability, transparency, and the consent of those being governed. It implies a recognition of the temporary and conditional nature of political authority, as well as the need to constantly justify one's actions and decisions to the public.

On the other hand, the concept of being "anointed" suggests a sense of entitlement, privilege, or divine authority that is not subject to question or challenge. It conveys an image of self-importance, elitism, and a lack of humility, all of which can lead to a disconnect between politicians and the people they are meant to serve. When politicians start to believe that they have been anointed rather than appointed, they may lose touch with the concerns and needs of the wider society, prioritizing their own interests or those of a select few over the common good.

This distinction is particularly relevant in democratic societies, where the legitimacy of political power is derived from the consent of the governed. Elected officials are expected to exercise their authority with a sense of humility, accountability, and a recognition of the inherent limitations of their positions. When they forget that they are appointed to serve the public, they risk alienating the very people whose trust and support they rely on to govern effectively.

Moreover, Pepper's quote speaks to the dangers of hubris and complacency in politics. When politicians start to believe that they have been anointed with some inherent right to rule, they may become detached from the realities of everyday life experienced by their constituents. This can breed a sense of entitlement, leading to decisions and policies that are detached from the genuine needs and aspirations of the population. It can also foster a culture of elitism and exclusivity within the political class, further eroding public trust and confidence in the democratic process.

In conclusion, Claude Pepper's quote serves as a poignant reminder to politicians about the nature of their roles and the responsibilities that come with them. By highlighting the distinction between being appointed and being anointed, he underscores the importance of humility, accountability, and a genuine commitment to serving the public interest. In a healthy democracy, political leaders must never lose sight of the fact that they are appointed to represent the people, not anointed with unassailable authority. Embracing this distinction can help to foster a more inclusive, responsive, and effective form of governance.