Meaning: The quote you've provided is attributed to John Perkins, an American author and former economist. In this quote, Perkins is referring to the United States as the "largest empire in the history of the world," and he suggests that this empire was built predominantly through means other than military force. He specifically mentions the period of the last 50 years since World War II and asserts that the US has used "very little military might" to achieve its imperial status. He further implies that military intervention, such as the Iraq War, is an exception rather than the rule in the expansion of this empire.

Perkins' quote touches on several complex and controversial topics, including the nature of empire, the use of military power, and the role of the United States in global affairs. To fully understand and discuss his statement, it's important to explore the historical context and the various interpretations and criticisms of his perspective.

First, it's crucial to acknowledge that the concept of "empire" can be understood in different ways. Traditionally, an empire is defined as a group of territories or nations ruled by a single sovereign power, often through force or coercion. While the United States does not fit this definition in a traditional sense, some scholars argue that its economic, political, and cultural influence around the world resembles that of an empire. This influence is often referred to as "soft power," a term used to describe the ability to shape the preferences of others through appeal and attraction rather than coercion or payment.

Perkins' claim that the US has built its empire with "very little military might" is a point of contention. Critics argue that the United States has a long history of military intervention and covert operations to influence the affairs of other nations, especially during the Cold War and in the post-9/11 era. They point to instances such as the Vietnam War, the Korean War, the Gulf War, and numerous military interventions in Latin America, the Middle East, and other regions as evidence of significant military involvement in advancing US interests.

On the other hand, supporters of Perkins' perspective might argue that the US has indeed exerted considerable influence through economic and cultural means. They might point to the spread of American consumer culture, the dominance of the US dollar in international trade, and the global reach of American multinational corporations as examples of non-military mechanisms of control and influence.

It's also essential to consider the geopolitical implications of Perkins' statement. The idea that the US has built the "largest empire in the history of the world" raises questions about the impact of American power on the sovereignty and self-determination of other nations. Critics of US foreign policy often highlight the negative consequences of American intervention, including civilian casualties, political instability, and the erosion of trust in international institutions.

In conclusion, John Perkins' quote provides a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of American power and influence in the world. While his assertion that the US has built its empire with "very little military might" may be disputed by critics, it offers an opportunity to critically examine the various ways in which nations exert influence on the global stage. Understanding the complexities of empire, military intervention, and the dynamics of international power is crucial for informed discussions about the role of the United States in the world.