This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that.

Profession: Economist

Topics: History, Life, Men, People, Cheating, Fraud, Manipulation, World,

Wallpaper of quote
Views: 17
Meaning: The quote you've provided is from John Perkins, an American author and former economist. In this quote, Perkins is acknowledging his involvement in what he refers to as an empire built through economic manipulation, cheating, fraud, and seduction. He mentions being a part of a group he calls "economic hit men." This quote is taken from his book "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man," which was published in 2004. In the book, Perkins provides a firsthand account of his experiences working as an economic consultant, and he reveals the practices and tactics used by the United States to gain influence and control over developing countries.

Perkins' use of the term "empire" in this quote is significant as it suggests a powerful and dominant force exerting control over other nations. He describes this empire as being distinct from any other in history due to its reliance on economic means rather than traditional military conquest. This points to the role of economic power and manipulation in shaping the global order, challenging the conventional understanding of empire-building.

The phrase "economic manipulation" in the quote refers to the use of financial tools and tactics to influence the economic and political decisions of other countries. This can take various forms, such as imposing unfair trade agreements, extending loans with stringent conditions, or leveraging international financial institutions to advance the interests of the dominating nation. Perkins suggests that these actions were carried out with the intention of serving the empire's own economic and geopolitical agenda, often at the expense of the target countries' sovereignty and well-being.

Perkins also mentions "cheating" and "fraud" as methods employed in building this empire. This implies unethical and deceptive practices aimed at achieving economic and political objectives. Such actions may involve bribery, corruption, or misrepresentation, all of which undermine the principles of fair and transparent international relations. Perkins' acknowledgment of these activities sheds light on the darker side of global economic interactions and raises questions about the ethical implications of such behavior.

The phrase "seducing people into our way of life" highlights the use of cultural and lifestyle influence as a tool for expanding the empire's reach. This could involve promoting consumerism, Western values, and the adoption of specific ideologies as a means of aligning other nations with the interests of the empire. By framing this process as "seducing," Perkins emphasizes the deliberate and persuasive nature of these efforts, suggesting a level of manipulation in shaping the preferences and behaviors of foreign populations.

The term "economic hit men," coined by Perkins, refers to individuals like himself who are employed to carry out economic coercion and manipulation on behalf of powerful interests. These individuals operate in a covert manner, leveraging their expertise to advance the agenda of the empire through financial means. By acknowledging his role as an economic hit man, Perkins offers a candid admission of his involvement in activities that he now views as detrimental and exploitative.

In conclusion, John Perkins' quote sheds light on the mechanisms and tactics employed in what he describes as the building of an empire through economic manipulation, cheating, fraud, and seduction. His reflections provide a critical perspective on the impact of global economic practices and the role of powerful nations in shaping the world order. Perkins' insights invite further examination of the ethical implications of economic influence and the complexities of international relations in the modern era.

0.0 / 5

0 Reviews

5
(0)

4
(0)

3
(0)

2
(0)

1
(0)