Meaning: The quote "Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but withstand progress" by Alan Perlis, a prominent computer scientist, speaks to the idea that certain programming languages are capable of adapting to new developments and changes in technology, but may struggle to keep pace with progress and innovation. In this quote, Perlis is highlighting the distinction between change and progress within the context of programming languages, suggesting that while some languages can accommodate modifications and updates, they may not necessarily facilitate or embrace true advancements in the field of computer science.

Alan Perlis was an influential figure in the field of computer science, known for his work in programming languages, software design, and artificial intelligence. He was the first recipient of the Turing Award, which is often considered the Nobel Prize of computing, and his contributions to the field have had a lasting impact on the development of programming languages and software engineering.

When Perlis speaks of programming languages that "absorb change," he is referring to their ability to incorporate new features, updates, and technological advancements. These languages may be flexible and adaptable, allowing for modifications to be made in response to evolving requirements and developments in the computing industry. However, Perlis also notes that these languages may "withstand progress," suggesting that they may struggle to keep up with the forward march of technology and innovation.

In the context of this quote, the distinction between change and progress is crucial. Change refers to the ability of a programming language to accommodate alterations and updates, whereas progress implies a deeper and more fundamental evolution of the language itself. Progress involves the development of new paradigms, methodologies, and capabilities that push the boundaries of what programming languages can achieve. While some languages may be adept at incorporating superficial changes, they may falter when it comes to embracing true progress in the field of computer science.

Perlis' quote prompts us to consider the nature of progress in programming languages. True progress in this context involves not just the addition of new features or syntax, but rather the ability of a language to adapt to new computational models, tackle complex problems, and facilitate innovative approaches to software development. Languages that can absorb change without withstanding progress may find themselves limited in their capacity to address the evolving needs of the industry and the growing complexity of software systems.

This quote also raises questions about the longevity and relevance of programming languages. While some languages may be able to adapt to immediate changes, they may struggle to remain viable and effective in the long term. As technology continues to advance and new challenges emerge, programming languages that withstand progress may become obsolete or ill-suited to addressing the demands of modern software development.

In conclusion, Alan Perlis' quote "Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but withstand progress" offers a thought-provoking insight into the nature of programming languages and their ability to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of technology. It serves as a reminder of the importance of progress in addition to change, and challenges us to consider the long-term viability and adaptability of programming languages in the face of ongoing innovation in the field of computer science.