Meaning: The quote by Ulrich Beck, a renowned sociologist, addresses the concept of open borders in Europe from a critical perspective. Beck's assertion that the concept of open borders is very selective and not taken seriously in the experience of non-Europeans reflects the complex and often contradictory nature of border policies and their impact on different groups of people.

Europe has been the destination for many migrants and refugees seeking safety, economic opportunities, or reunification with family members. However, the reality of their experiences often contradicts the notion of open borders. Beck's remark about "still closed borders" highlights the barriers and challenges that migrants and refugees face when trying to enter and settle in European countries. This can be attributed to a variety of factors, including stringent immigration laws, border controls, and political resistance to accepting newcomers.

From a sociological perspective, Beck's statement sheds light on the unequal treatment and perception of borders by different groups. While the idea of open borders may be embraced as a symbol of freedom and inclusivity within European discourse, the lived experiences of non-Europeans reveal a different reality. For many migrants and refugees, the concept of open borders remains elusive and inaccessible, as they encounter numerous obstacles and restrictions in their attempts to cross into Europe.

Moreover, Beck's critique underscores the power dynamics and the inherent biases that shape the discourse on migration and borders. The selective nature of open borders implies that certain groups are more privileged and have easier access to mobility, while others are marginalized and excluded. This selective application of border policies reflects broader issues of inequality, discrimination, and the perpetuation of hierarchies based on nationality, race, and socioeconomic status.

It is essential to consider the historical and geopolitical context in which Beck's quote is situated. Europe's colonial legacy, global economic disparities, and conflicts in neighboring regions have contributed to the influx of migrants and refugees seeking entry into the continent. The response to this migration has been highly contentious, with debates around security, cultural identity, and the perceived strain on resources shaping border policies and public attitudes.

In light of these complexities, Beck's assertion prompts us to critically examine the gap between rhetoric and reality regarding open borders. It calls for a reevaluation of how borders are constructed and enforced, as well as a reexamination of the principles of equality and justice in the context of migration. Beck's perspective challenges us to recognize the lived experiences of those directly affected by border regimes and to question the Eurocentric narratives that often dominate discussions on migration and mobility.

In conclusion, Ulrich Beck's quote encapsulates the paradoxical nature of open borders in Europe, highlighting the discrepancy between the idealized concept of openness and the lived experiences of non-Europeans. It serves as a reminder of the complex dynamics of migration, borders, and power relations, urging us to critically engage with the implications of border policies and their impact on different social groups. Beck's insight continues to resonate as a thought-provoking critique of the selective and often exclusionary nature of border regimes, prompting us to strive for a more inclusive and equitable approach to mobility and migration.