Meaning: This quote by Wendell Phillips, an American abolitionist, advocate for Native Americans, and orator, delves into the nature of success in political life. Phillips suggests that two types of individuals tend to thrive in the realm of politics: those with great talent but lacking in principles, and those with a steadfast principle of obedience to their superiors but lacking in talent. This quote offers an insightful perspective on the complexities of political success and the characteristics that often propel individuals to prominence in the political arena.

The first category described in the quote encompasses individuals who possess great talent but lack a firm set of principles. In the context of politics, this could refer to individuals who are adept at navigating the intricacies of political maneuvering, public speaking, and garnering support, yet may lack a consistent moral compass or a set of core values that guide their decisions and actions. These individuals may be skilled at persuading and influencing others, which often proves advantageous in the realm of politics, but their lack of firm principles may lead to opportunism and a willingness to compromise ethical standards for personal gain.

On the other hand, the second category outlined in the quote pertains to individuals who adhere strictly to the principle of obedience to their superiors, despite potentially lacking in natural talent or charisma. In the political context, this type of individual may excel due to their unwavering loyalty to authority figures or party leadership. Their commitment to following orders and aligning themselves with powerful figures can grant them access to opportunities and advancement within the political hierarchy, even if they do not possess the same level of innate talent or charisma as their counterparts.

It is important to note that Phillips' assessment of political success through this dichotomy reflects a critical perspective on the political landscape. He highlights the potential pitfalls of valuing talent or obedience above principles, suggesting that these qualities alone may not lead to ethical or effective governance. The quote prompts reflection on the qualities that are often prioritized and rewarded in political spheres, and the implications of such priorities on the broader functioning of political systems.

In contemporary political contexts, this quote remains relevant as it invites consideration of the qualities and behaviors that are valued and rewarded within political arenas. It prompts individuals to critically evaluate the dynamics of power, influence, and leadership within political systems, and to question the extent to which principles, talent, and obedience factor into the success of political figures.

In conclusion, Wendell Phillips' quote provides a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of success in political life, highlighting the dichotomy between individuals of great talent but no principles, and those of one principle - obedience to their superiors - but lacking in talent. This quote encourages critical examination of the qualities that often underpin political success and prompts consideration of the broader implications of prioritizing talent or obedience over principled leadership.