Meaning: The quote by John Pilger, a renowned journalist, reflects on the motivations and actions of nineteenth-century European imperialists as compared to modern-day imperialists. In this quote, Pilger asserts that the classic imperialists of the nineteenth century believed they were on a mission, driven by a sense of public service, while contemporary imperialists are characterized as mere pirates lacking the same sense of public duty.

During the nineteenth century, European imperialists embarked on missions of conquest and colonization, driven by ideologies of racial superiority, economic expansion, and the belief in the civilizing mission. Many imperialists believed that they were bringing progress, civilization, and Christianity to the "uncivilized" parts of the world. This sense of mission was often tied to a belief in the moral and cultural superiority of the European powers, and it justified the subjugation and exploitation of indigenous peoples and their lands. The imperialists saw themselves as agents of progress and enlightenment, with a duty to bring the benefits of European civilization to the rest of the world.

However, Pilger argues that modern-day imperialists do not share the same sense of public service. Instead, he describes them as pirates. This characterization suggests a stark departure from the perceived noble mission of their nineteenth-century counterparts. Modern-day imperialists are often seen as motivated by economic interests, resource extraction, geopolitical dominance, and the pursuit of power and control. Their actions are often criticized for prioritizing profit and influence over the well-being and self-determination of the affected populations.

Pilger's use of the term "pirates" conveys a sense of lawlessness, exploitation, and plunder. It implies a disregard for international law, human rights, and ethical considerations in pursuit of wealth and power. This portrayal of modern imperialists as pirates highlights the predatory and selfish nature of their actions, contrasting sharply with the self-proclaimed mission of the classic imperialists.

In the context of contemporary global affairs, Pilger's quote can be interpreted as a critique of the neocolonial practices of powerful nations and multinational corporations. The exploitation of natural resources, environmental degradation, military interventions, and economic dominance in the developing world are often cited as examples of modern imperialism. These actions are seen as driven by self-interest and the pursuit of profit, rather than a genuine commitment to the betterment of the societies being affected.

Furthermore, the quote raises questions about the evolving nature of imperialism and the shifting dynamics of power and influence in the modern world. It prompts reflection on the moral justifications, or lack thereof, for interventionist policies, military interventions, and economic exploitation in the contemporary geopolitical landscape.

In summary, John Pilger's quote encapsulates a critical perspective on the motivations and behaviors of imperialists, past and present. It invites contemplation on the ethical dimensions of global power dynamics, the legacies of colonialism, and the responsibilities of nations and corporations in their interactions with the rest of the world. By contrasting the sense of mission of classic European imperialists with the characterization of modern imperialists as pirates, Pilger prompts us to consider the evolving nature of imperialism and its implications for global justice and equity.

Overall, the quote invites us to critically examine the actions and motivations of powerful entities in the international arena and to consider the impact of their pursuits on the societies and environments they affect. It serves as a reminder of the ongoing relevance of historical legacies and the need for ethical scrutiny of contemporary power dynamics.