Meaning: The quote by Harold Pinter is a powerful indictment of U.S. foreign policy, highlighting the perceived pattern of systematic and relentless actions carried out by the United States on a global scale. Pinter, a renowned dramatist, was also known for his strong political views and criticism of Western governments, particularly the U.S. and its involvement in international affairs.

Pinter's assertion that the crimes of the U.S. have been systematic suggests that he believed there was a deliberate and organized approach to the actions taken by the U.S. government in its interactions with other countries. This could refer to a range of activities, including military interventions, covert operations, and support for authoritarian regimes, that have been perceived as detrimental to the well-being of people in other parts of the world.

The use of the word "constant" emphasizes the enduring nature of these actions, suggesting that Pinter saw a consistent and ongoing pattern of behavior by the U.S. that extended over a significant period of time. This could be interpreted as a criticism of the perceived lack of change or reform in U.S. foreign policy, despite shifts in presidential administrations or changes in geopolitical circumstances.

The word "clinical" adds a chilling and calculated dimension to Pinter's description of U.S. actions. It suggests a detached and methodical approach to carrying out these actions, devoid of emotion or ethical considerations. This choice of words implies a sense of precision and efficiency in the execution of U.S. foreign policy, which Pinter may have viewed as particularly disturbing in its implications.

The use of "remorseless" underscores the lack of regret or guilt associated with these actions, reinforcing the idea that Pinter believed the U.S. government and its agents operated with a callous disregard for the consequences of their actions on the lives of people in other countries. This reflects a moral condemnation of the U.S.'s perceived lack of accountability for the repercussions of its foreign policy decisions.

Pinter's assertion that these actions have been "fully documented" suggests that he believed there was a wealth of evidence to support his claims. This could refer to historical records, declassified documents, investigative journalism, and academic research that have shed light on U.S. interventions and their impact on other nations. Pinter's emphasis on the existence of documentation implies that he saw these actions as undeniable and deserving of greater attention and scrutiny.

The closing statement, "but nobody talks about them," serves as a poignant commentary on the lack of public discourse and accountability surrounding the U.S.'s alleged transgressions. Pinter may have been highlighting the disparity between the extensive documentation of these actions and the relative absence of mainstream attention and public debate on the subject. This could be seen as a critique of the media, political leaders, and the general populace for their perceived indifference or complicity in overlooking these issues.

In conclusion, Harold Pinter's quote encapsulates a scathing critique of U.S. foreign policy, portraying it as a relentless and unrepentant force with far-reaching global implications. His words challenge readers to confront the documented history of U.S. actions and to consider the ethical and moral implications of these actions on a global scale. While the quote reflects Pinter's own perspective and opinions, it raises important questions about the responsibilities of powerful nations in the international arena and the need for greater transparency and accountability in global affairs.