Meaning: This quote by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato reflects on the tendency of society to label and categorize diseases with unusual and unfamiliar names. Plato, who lived around 428-348 BCE, was a student of Socrates and the teacher of Aristotle. His works have had a profound influence on Western philosophy and thought. In this quote, Plato's observation about the naming of diseases raises questions about the nature of language, perception, and the human understanding of illness.

Plato's remark about the naming of diseases suggests a sense of bewilderment or bemusement at the unconventional and perplexing terminology used to describe various ailments. In ancient times, the understanding of diseases and their causes was often shrouded in superstition and mysticism. The naming of diseases may have reflected this lack of scientific understanding, leading to the use of esoteric or cryptic terms.

Plato's critique of the naming of diseases may also be interpreted as a commentary on the human tendency to create elaborate taxonomies and classifications for phenomena that are not fully understood. The act of naming diseases, in this context, becomes a symbolic representation of humanity's quest to impose order and structure on the chaotic and unpredictable aspects of life, including illness and suffering.

Furthermore, Plato's use of the term "newfangled" suggests that he perceived the naming of diseases as a contemporary practice that was influenced by trends or fads. This implies that the naming of diseases may have been subject to cultural and societal influences, rather than being based solely on empirical evidence or scientific principles.

In the modern context, Plato's observation about the naming of diseases resonates with the ongoing evolution of medical terminology and the challenges of effectively communicating complex medical concepts to the general public. The names of diseases are often derived from Latin or Greek roots, reflecting the historical influence of ancient languages on medical science. While this tradition of nomenclature can provide a sense of consistency and coherence within the medical community, it can also contribute to the perception of diseases as mysterious and inscrutable entities.

Plato's quote also raises broader questions about the power dynamics inherent in the act of naming diseases. The process of naming diseases can shape public perceptions and attitudes towards illness, influencing the stigmatization or marginalization of certain conditions. Furthermore, the naming of diseases can have profound implications for the allocation of resources, research funding, and public health policies.

In conclusion, Plato's quote sheds light on the enduring complexities and nuances associated with the naming of diseases. His reflection invites us to consider the cultural, linguistic, and societal dimensions of disease nomenclature, prompting us to critically examine the ways in which we label and conceptualize illness. By engaging with Plato's timeless wisdom, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the intricate interplay between language, perception, and the human experience of disease.