Meaning: The quote by J. Priestley, a renowned English writer, provides an insightful analogy comparing public opinion polls to children in a garden. The comparison draws attention to the nature of public opinion polls and the continuous process of assessing and analyzing public sentiment. In this quote, Priestley suggests that just as children are curious and constantly digging to observe the growth of plants in a garden, public opinion polls are similarly engaged in the ongoing task of examining and interpreting the evolving opinions of the public.

The comparison of public opinion polls to children in a garden aptly captures the dynamic and fluid nature of public opinion. Much like a garden that changes and grows over time, public sentiment is subject to fluctuations and developments. The act of "digging things up" in the context of public opinion polls can be seen as a metaphor for the process of uncovering and examining the views and attitudes of the populace. This constant probing and investigation reflect the inherent curiosity and desire to understand the changing landscape of public opinion.

Moreover, the analogy highlights the role of public opinion polls as a means of measurement and assessment. Just as children dig to observe the growth of plants, public opinion polls seek to gauge and understand the growth or shifts in public sentiment on various issues. This process of "digging" involves collecting data, conducting surveys, and analyzing responses to gain insights into the prevailing attitudes and beliefs within a society.

Furthermore, the comparison emphasizes the inherent inquisitiveness and curiosity involved in both activities. Children in a garden are naturally curious and eager to explore, much like the researchers and analysts who are driven by a similar curiosity to delve into the dynamics of public opinion. The quote suggests that this curiosity is a fundamental aspect of both activities, driving the continuous process of inquiry and investigation.

It is also important to consider the underlying implications of this analogy. By likening public opinion polls to children in a garden, Priestley may be drawing attention to the potential fragility and vulnerability of public opinion. Much like a garden that requires care and attention to thrive, public opinion is influenced by various factors and can be shaped by external forces. The analogy may serve as a reminder of the need for careful interpretation and consideration of the findings derived from public opinion polls, recognizing the potential for fluctuations and the impact of external influences.

In conclusion, J. Priestley's comparison of public opinion polls to children in a garden offers a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of public sentiment and the process of measurement and analysis. By drawing parallels between the continuous exploration of a garden by children and the ongoing examination of public opinion, the quote encapsulates the dynamic and ever-changing nature of public sentiment. It serves as a reminder of the curiosity, measurement, and interpretation involved in understanding the evolving landscape of public opinion.