Meaning: Carroll Quigley, an American historian and theorist, made this statement in his book "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time," published in 1966. Quigley was a highly influential figure in the field of history and political science, and his work continues to be a subject of discussion and analysis.

In this quote, Quigley is referring to a perceived attack by the Radical Right in the United States on what they believe to be a Communist power structure. The statement reflects Quigley's observation of the political dynamics of the time and his analysis of the motivations and perceptions of the Radical Right in the United States.

To understand the context of this quote, it is essential to delve into the historical and political landscape of the United States during the period in which Quigley was writing. The mid-20th century was marked by the Cold War, a geopolitical rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union, which fueled intense ideological and political divisions within American society.

The Radical Right in the United States, often associated with anti-communist sentiments and fervent opposition to leftist ideologies, viewed the perceived Communist power structure as a threat to American values, institutions, and freedoms. This perception led to a sustained and vigorous campaign by the Radical Right to combat what they saw as the infiltration and influence of Communism in various aspects of American life, including government, media, and academia.

Quigley's assertion that the Radical Right was, in fact, targeting a power structure rather than actual Communists underscores his analysis of the complex interplay of political forces and ideologies. He suggests that the Radical Right's efforts were directed at a perceived power structure, which may not have been synonymous with actual Communist individuals or organizations. This distinction is crucial in understanding the nature of political rhetoric and the dynamics of ideological conflict.

Moreover, Quigley's statement raises broader questions about the nature of political discourse, the manipulation of public perceptions, and the dynamics of power struggles. It prompts an examination of the strategies and tactics employed by political movements to mobilize support, shape narratives, and confront perceived adversaries.

Quigley's work has been the subject of both praise and criticism. While some have lauded his comprehensive historical analysis and insights into global politics, others have raised questions about the implications of his assertions and interpretations. Nevertheless, the quote in question encapsulates Quigley's keen observation of the complexities underlying political confrontations and the nuanced dynamics of power and ideology.

In conclusion, Carroll Quigley's quote sheds light on the dynamics of political conflict and ideological struggle in the United States during the mid-20th century. It provides valuable insight into the motivations and perceptions of the Radical Right and invites deeper reflection on the nature of power structures, political rhetoric, and the complexities of ideological confrontations. Quigley's work continues to provoke thoughtful analysis and remains a significant contribution to the understanding of global history and politics.