Meaning: The quote "Both of them were the children of the United States. They sacrificed their children for the benefit of the others. But they were not very devoted children of the United States" is a thought-provoking statement made by Akbar Rafsanjani, a prominent Iranian politician and one of the most influential figures in the history of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This quote reflects Rafsanjani's views on the relationship between the United States and certain groups or individuals who may have been connected to the country, but did not demonstrate unwavering loyalty or devotion to it.

The first part of the quote, "Both of them were the children of the United States," suggests that the entities or individuals in question had some form of connection or affiliation with the United States. This connection could be interpreted in various ways, including political, social, or cultural ties. It implies that they were in some way shaped or influenced by the United States, much like children are shaped by their parents.

The next part of the quote, "They sacrificed their children for the benefit of the others," is a metaphorical expression that suggests a willingness to make sacrifices for the betterment of others. This sacrifice could refer to the actions or decisions made by these entities or individuals, which may have had consequences for their own "children" or interests. The use of the term "children" in this context likely symbolizes the interests or well-being of those connected to the United States, and the sacrifice could represent decisions made in favor of others, possibly at the expense of their own interests.

The final part of the quote, "But they were not very devoted children of the United States," introduces a critical perspective. It suggests that despite the connection to the United States and the sacrifices made, these entities or individuals were not fully committed or loyal to the country. This lack of devotion could imply a sense of disloyalty, ambivalence, or conflicting interests. Rafsanjani seems to be highlighting a perceived inconsistency between the actions taken and the level of dedication to the United States.

It is important to note that the quote can be interpreted in various ways depending on the context in which it was spoken and the specific individuals or groups to which it may refer. However, the underlying themes of connection, sacrifice, and devotion to the United States are evident in Rafsanjani's words.

Akbar Rafsanjani was known for his complex and often controversial views on international relations, particularly regarding the United States and its role in global affairs. As a key figure in Iranian politics, Rafsanjani played a significant role in shaping the country's foreign policy and diplomatic relations. His perspective on the relationship between the United States and other actors reflects the complexities and nuances of international politics, as well as the intricate dynamics of power and influence on the global stage.

In conclusion, the quote by Akbar Rafsanjani offers a thought-provoking reflection on the relationship between individuals or entities and their connection to the United States. It raises questions about loyalty, sacrifice, and the complexities of international relations. While the specific context and referents of the quote may vary, its underlying themes invite further contemplation on the dynamics of power, influence, and allegiance in the realm of global politics.