Meaning:
This quote by John Ransom suggests that both art and religion require a suspension of strict logic in order to flourish. Ransom uses the metaphor of the "enfant terrible of logic" to describe the disruptive nature of pure reason when it comes to engaging in artistic or religious practices. In this context, "enfant terrible" refers to a person or thing that is unconventional, rebellious, or unpredictable in a way that is shocking or unsettling. Ransom argues that in order to fully engage with art and religion, one must learn to "make allowances" and quiet the disruptive nature of strict logic.
Art and religion are often seen as domains that transcend strict rationality and logic. They deal with emotions, spirituality, and the human experience in ways that cannot always be neatly categorized or explained by logical reasoning alone. Ransom's quote suggests that in order to fully appreciate and participate in these realms, individuals must be willing to set aside the demands of pure logic and embrace the messier, more intuitive aspects of human existence.
In the context of art, the quote speaks to the idea that creativity and expression often defy rational explanation. Artistic endeavors frequently involve tapping into emotions, imagination, and intuition, all of which may run counter to the neat and tidy world of logic. Artists often challenge established norms and conventions, pushing boundaries and exploring new possibilities. Ransom's quote implies that in order for art to thrive, there must be a willingness to suspend the strictures of logic and allow for the free flow of creativity and expression.
In the realm of religion, the quote suggests that faith and spirituality are not always compatible with strict adherence to logical reasoning. Many religious traditions involve beliefs and practices that are based on faith, mystery, and divine revelation, rather than empirical evidence or rational proof. Ransom's quote implies that in order to engage with the profound meaning and significance that religion offers, individuals must be willing to set aside the demands of strict logic and embrace the more transcendent and mysterious aspects of religious experience.
Ransom's use of the phrase "enfant terrible of logic" is particularly evocative, suggesting that the disruptive nature of pure reason can be likened to a rebellious and uncontrollable force that disrupts the harmony of other faculties. This imagery serves to highlight the tension between the demands of logic and the more elusive, intuitive aspects of human experience found in art and religion.
Overall, Ransom's quote encourages us to recognize the limitations of pure logic when it comes to engaging with art and religion. It challenges us to embrace the messier, more intuitive aspects of human existence and to make allowances for the ways in which art and religion transcend the strictures of logic. In doing so, Ransom suggests, we can fully appreciate the richness and depth of these fundamental aspects of human culture and experience.