Meaning: This quote by Simon Raven, a British novelist and screenwriter, reflects on the shifting dynamics of social class and privilege in post-war Britain. Raven was known for his keen observations of the British upper-middle-class society, and this quote encapsulates his interest in examining the impact of societal changes on his own generation.

Raven's desire to "look at the upper-middle-class scene since the war" suggests a critical examination of the social and cultural landscape in the aftermath of World War II. The war brought about significant changes in British society, including the erosion of traditional class structures and the emergence of a more egalitarian ethos. Raven's focus on the upper-middle class indicates a specific interest in understanding how this privileged segment of society navigated the evolving socio-economic and political landscape.

The phrase "my generation's part in it" underscores Raven's personal investment in the subject matter. As a member of the upper-middle class himself, he sought to explore the role and experiences of his own generation within this context. This introspective approach suggests a nuanced exploration of identity, privilege, and social responsibility.

The mention of "privileged members of a privileged class" acknowledges the inherent advantages and entitlements that come with belonging to the upper-middle class. Raven seems to grapple with the implications of this privilege in a changing world, raising questions about accountability and ethical obligations. The juxtaposition of privilege with "the Age of the Common Man" highlights the contrast between the established elite and the rising influence of the broader populace.

The phrase "How were we faring in the Age of the Common Man? How ought we to be faring?" encapsulates Raven's central inquiries. He seeks to assess the adaptation and conduct of his cohort within the evolving societal framework. The juxtaposition of "were" and "ought" implies a moral dimension, suggesting that Raven is not only interested in describing the state of affairs but also in evaluating it against a standard of ethical comportment.

Raven's exploration of these themes aligns with broader discussions of social mobility, privilege, and class consciousness in post-war Britain. The aftermath of the war brought about notable shifts in social attitudes and political ideologies, with an increasing emphasis on equality and social justice. Raven's contemplation of his generation's place in this transformed landscape reflects a broader societal dialogue about responsibility, equity, and the evolving meaning of privilege.

In conclusion, Simon Raven's quote captures his introspective and critical approach to examining the status and role of the upper-middle class in post-war Britain. His inquiry into the adaptation and ethical responsibilities of his own generation within a changing social order reflects a nuanced engagement with issues of privilege, class dynamics, and societal transformation. Raven's work offers valuable insights into the complexities of social identity and the moral challenges posed by shifting power dynamics.