Meaning: Herbert Read, a prominent poet and art critic, delves into the concept of religion in the quote, "I call religion a natural authority, but it has usually been conceived as a supernatural authority." This thought-provoking statement challenges the conventional perception of religion as a supernatural force and instead posits it as a natural authority. In order to fully understand Read's perspective, it is essential to explore the implications of his words and the broader context in which they are situated.

Religion has historically been intertwined with the supernatural, often characterized by beliefs in deities, miracles, and divine intervention. This traditional understanding of religion as a supernatural authority is deeply rooted in various religious traditions and has shaped the way people perceive and interact with the concept of spirituality. However, Read's assertion introduces a different lens through which to view religion, one that emphasizes its natural essence rather than its supernatural manifestations.

When Read refers to religion as a "natural authority," he may be alluding to the inherent human inclination towards spiritual and moral guidance. From this perspective, religion serves as a source of ethical principles, community cohesion, and existential meaning, all of which are deeply ingrained in human nature. By recognizing religion as a natural authority, Read invites us to consider the intrinsic human need for spiritual connection and ethical frameworks, irrespective of the supernatural elements often associated with traditional religious practices.

Furthermore, Read's characterization of religion as a natural authority also suggests a departure from the overtly mystical and otherworldly aspects often associated with religious traditions. Instead, it emphasizes the tangible and observable impact of religion on the lives of individuals and communities. This view aligns with a more humanistic interpretation of religion, one that focuses on its role in shaping human behavior, societal norms, and cultural practices.

In a broader sense, Read's quote challenges us to reexamine the relationship between the natural and supernatural realms within the context of religion. It prompts us to question whether the essence of religion lies in its connection to the transcendent and mystical, or if it is grounded in the tangible realities of human experience and societal structures. This reframing of religious authority encourages a more nuanced understanding of spirituality and its significance in the modern world.

Moreover, Read's perspective on religion as a natural authority opens up discussions about the evolving nature of religious belief and practice in contemporary society. As the influence of organized religion undergoes shifts in many parts of the world, there is a growing emphasis on spirituality that is personally meaningful and socially relevant. By recognizing religion as a natural authority, individuals and communities can engage in a more inclusive and pluralistic dialogue about the role of spirituality in their lives, irrespective of specific dogmas or supernatural beliefs.

In conclusion, Herbert Read's quote offers a thought-provoking reevaluation of the concept of religion, challenging the traditional view of it as a supernatural authority and proposing an understanding of it as a natural authority. This perspective invites us to reconsider the intrinsic human need for spiritual and ethical guidance, as well as the tangible impact of religion on individuals and societies. By embracing this alternative outlook, we can engage in more inclusive and meaningful discussions about the role of spirituality in our lives and communities.