Meaning: The quote by Herbert Read, a British poet and art critic, delves into the tension between the aristocratic function of art and the democratic structure of modern society. This statement reflects a fundamental conflict in the relationship between art and society, highlighting the challenges inherent in reconciling the traditional elitist role of art with the principles of democracy.

Herbert Read was a prominent figure in the field of art criticism and aesthetics during the 20th century, and his work often explored the complex interplay between art, society, and politics. In this quote, he suggests that the inherent contradiction between the aristocratic nature of art and the democratic makeup of modern society is a persistent and unresolvable issue.

The concept of the "aristocratic function of art" refers to the historical association of art with elite or privileged classes. Throughout history, art has often been intertwined with aristocracy, serving as a symbol of wealth, power, and social status. From royal patronage of artists to the cultivation of highbrow cultural tastes among the upper classes, the traditional role of art has been closely linked to aristocratic values and societal hierarchies.

On the other hand, the "democratic structure of modern society" alludes to the principles of equality, inclusivity, and popular sovereignty that underpin democratic systems. In modern democratic societies, there is an emphasis on broadening access to art and culture, promoting diversity and representation, and challenging traditional elitist notions of artistic value.

The tension between these two forces – the aristocratic function of art and the democratic structure of society – arises from the contrasting values and expectations they embody. While art has historically been associated with exclusivity and elitism, modern democratic societies strive to promote accessibility, diversity, and cultural participation for all members of society.

Read's assertion that this contradiction "can never be resolved" suggests a deep-seated skepticism about the possibility of reconciling these opposing forces. He seems to imply that the inherent aristocratic nature of art and the egalitarian ethos of democratic society are fundamentally irreconcilable, leading to an enduring and irresolvable tension.

This tension manifests in various aspects of the art world and cultural discourse. For example, debates around funding for the arts often revolve around questions of elitism and accessibility, with discussions about public support for artistic institutions and the role of art in serving diverse communities. Additionally, the art market's relationship with wealth and privilege frequently underscores the enduring influence of aristocratic values within the realm of art.

However, it is important to note that Read's assertion of an irreconcilable contradiction between the aristocratic function of art and the democratic structure of modern society is not universally accepted. Some scholars and practitioners argue that the relationship between art and society is more dynamic and multifaceted, capable of evolving and adapting to changing social and political contexts.

In conclusion, Herbert Read's quote encapsulates a thought-provoking insight into the enduring tension between the aristocratic nature of art and the democratic ideals of modern society. By highlighting this fundamental contradiction, Read prompts us to consider the complex interplay between art, privilege, and democracy, and the ongoing challenges of navigating this intricate relationship.