Meaning: The quote "It often seemed like we had become a nation where the only heroes were rock singers and ball players and that there were no large men of probity who could be called upon for the task" by Elliot Richardson, a prominent lawyer and public servant, reflects a sentiment about the changing perception of heroes and role models in American society. The quote suggests a shift in the values and ideals upheld by the public, where traditional figures of integrity and honor are being overshadowed by celebrities and athletes.

In the context of the quote, "large men of probity" can be interpreted as individuals of significant stature, both in character and influence, who are known for their moral uprightness and integrity. Richardson's use of the phrase "rock singers and ball players" serves to contrast these traditional figures of probity with modern-day celebrities who are often celebrated for their talents and achievements in entertainment and sports. This juxtaposition highlights a perceived lack of reverence for individuals who embody moral and ethical values, and an emphasis on those who excel in more superficial or entertainment-oriented pursuits.

Elliot Richardson's observation speaks to a broader cultural shift that has been taking place over the past few decades. With the rise of mass media and celebrity culture, there has been a noticeable elevation of entertainers and athletes to the status of heroes and role models. These individuals often command significant public attention and adulation, and their influence extends beyond their respective fields of expertise. As a result, traditional figures of probity, such as statesmen, scholars, and civic leaders, may appear to have been marginalized in the public eye.

The quote also suggests a concern about the implications of this shift in societal values. The idea that there are "no large men of probity who could be called upon for the task" implies a lack of dependable and trustworthy figures to fulfill important roles and responsibilities in society. Richardson seems to be lamenting the absence of individuals who embody the qualities of honor, integrity, and moral leadership that are essential for the functioning of a healthy and ethical society.

It is worth noting that Richardson's observation is not without controversy or debate. Some may argue that the portrayal of entertainers and athletes as the predominant heroes of modern society is an oversimplification. While it is true that popular culture often celebrates individuals from these domains, there are also many examples of public figures from diverse backgrounds who continue to exemplify probity and moral leadership. Furthermore, the evolving nature of heroism and role models in a dynamic and diverse society may necessitate a broader understanding of the qualities that inspire admiration and emulation.

In conclusion, Elliot Richardson's quote captures a thought-provoking perspective on the changing landscape of heroism and moral leadership in American society. It raises important questions about the values and ideals upheld by the public, as well as the perceived shift in the types of individuals who are celebrated and revered as role models. While the quote may reflect a sense of nostalgia for traditional figures of probity, it also serves as a catalyst for critical reflection on the qualities and attributes that define heroism and moral leadership in contemporary culture.