Meaning: The quote by Elliot Richardson reflects the internal conflict and dilemma experienced by individuals working in the public sector, particularly in government positions. Richardson, a prominent lawyer and public official, expresses his excitement at the prospect of working in the State Department, a prestigious and influential entity within the US government. However, he also acknowledges a nagging concern about the potential for stagnation and loss of personal ambition if he were to remain in Washington for an extended period.

The notion of being in the State Department, or any government role for that matter, can indeed be appealing to many individuals. These positions often offer the opportunity to contribute to important policy decisions, engage in diplomacy, and affect change on a national or even global scale. For ambitious and driven individuals like Richardson, the allure of such a role is understandable. The chance to work at the highest levels of government and be involved in shaping the direction of the country is undeniably exciting and prestigious.

However, Richardson's apprehension about becoming a "government hack" speaks to a common concern among those working in public service. The term "government hack" typically refers to someone who is perceived as a career bureaucrat, more concerned with maintaining the status quo and adhering to bureaucratic processes than with enacting meaningful change or pursuing personal aspirations. This fear of becoming complacent or losing one's drive and ambition is a valid concern for many individuals working in government roles.

In a broader sense, Richardson's quote also touches on the tension between public service and political ambition. Many individuals who enter government roles do so with a genuine desire to serve the public and make a positive impact. However, the world of politics can be alluring, offering the potential for greater influence, higher visibility, and the opportunity to directly shape policy through elected office. The desire to transition from a bureaucratic role to a more overtly political one is a common career trajectory for many individuals in the public sector.

It's important to note that Richardson himself ultimately pursued a career that blended both public service and politics. Over the course of his career, he held various government positions, including serving as Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Secretary of Defense, and Attorney General. He also ran for political office, seeking the governorship of Massachusetts and serving as a US Senator. Richardson's career trajectory serves as a testament to the possibility of navigating the intersection of public service and political ambition.

In conclusion, Richardson's quote encapsulates the internal conflict faced by many individuals working in government roles. The tension between the excitement of public service and the fear of becoming stagnant or losing sight of personal ambitions is a common experience. It also underscores the complex relationship between public service and political ambition, as individuals navigate their careers in pursuit of both personal fulfillment and the opportunity to make a meaningful impact on society.