Meaning: The quote by Jacques Rivette, a prominent French film director, critic, and theorist, offers a critical perspective on the approach of certain young directors to film history. Rivette suggests that some contemporary filmmakers seem to disregard or overlook the rich heritage of cinema that predates the 1980s. This quote raises important questions about the relationship between contemporary filmmakers and the history of cinema, as well as the impact of historical awareness on the creative process.

Rivette's observation can be interpreted in several ways. On one level, it may reflect a concern about the potential limitations of contemporary filmmakers' perspectives on the medium of film. By suggesting that these directors seemingly disregard film history before 1980, Rivette highlights the importance of a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of cinema. He implies that a narrow focus on recent developments may lead to a lack of appreciation for the diverse traditions, styles, and artistic achievements that have shaped the medium over the decades.

Moreover, Rivette's remark sheds light on the broader issue of historical consciousness in filmmaking. Understanding the history of cinema can provide filmmakers with valuable insights, references, and inspirations. By embracing a wider historical perspective, directors can enrich their creative vision and engage with a broader range of cinematic traditions. This historical consciousness can also empower filmmakers to challenge conventions, experiment with different styles, and contribute to the ongoing evolution of the medium.

Furthermore, the quote invites reflection on the role of film education and cultural awareness in shaping the perspectives of emerging filmmakers. It raises questions about the extent to which film schools, mentorship programs, and exposure to diverse cinematic traditions equip young directors with a comprehensive understanding of film history. Rivette's observation suggests the need for an educational approach that encourages aspiring filmmakers to explore the rich legacy of cinema across different eras and cultures.

In addition, Rivette's quote prompts consideration of the cultural and technological transformations that have shaped the practice of filmmaking. The period prior to 1980 represents a significant era in the history of cinema, marked by the emergence of various movements, influential auteurs, and technological advancements. By alluding to this temporal boundary, Rivette draws attention to the profound shifts in filmmaking practices, aesthetics, and industry dynamics that have occurred over time. This raises the question of how these historical changes continue to inform and influence contemporary filmmaking.

Moreover, the quote may also be seen as a call for a critical reassessment of contemporary cinematic trends and their relationship to the broader trajectory of film history. By highlighting the selective historical perspective of certain young directors, Rivette encourages a thoughtful examination of the prevailing tendencies, influences, and thematic preoccupations in contemporary cinema. This invites a dialogue about the significance of historical continuity and innovation in the evolution of the art form.

In conclusion, Jacques Rivette's quote offers a thought-provoking commentary on the relationship between contemporary filmmakers and the history of cinema. It underscores the importance of historical consciousness, cultural awareness, and the broader trajectory of film history in shaping the perspectives and creative endeavors of young directors. By engaging with Rivette's observation, filmmakers, scholars, and cinephiles can further explore the complex interplay between tradition and innovation in the ever-evolving art of cinema.