Meaning: The quote "But the egoist has no ideals, for the knowledge that his ideals are only his ideals, frees him from their domination. He acts for his own interest, not for the interest of ideals" by John Robinson Politician delves into the concept of egoism and its implications on the formation of ideals and decision-making. Egoism, in philosophical terms, refers to the ethical theory that treats self-interest as the foundation of morality. The quote suggests that an egoist does not adhere to any set of ideals because they are aware that these ideals are subjective and personal to them, thus freeing them from being dominated by these ideals. Instead, the egoist acts solely for their own self-interest, rather than being motivated by the interest of ideals.

The concept of egoism has been explored by various philosophers throughout history, each offering their own perspectives on the ethical implications of prioritizing self-interest. In the context of this quote, it is important to consider the distinction between egoism and altruism. Altruism, the ethical doctrine that emphasizes the well-being of others over one's own self-interest, stands in contrast to egoism. The quote suggests that the egoist's lack of adherence to ideals sets them apart from those who are guided by principles of altruism.

The idea that the egoist has no ideals because they recognize that their ideals are personal and subjective points to the freedom that comes with this realization. By acknowledging that their ideals are not universal truths but rather personal constructs, the egoist is liberated from the constraints of these ideals. This liberation allows the egoist to make decisions and act in ways that serve their own self-interest without feeling beholden to any external standards or ideals.

Furthermore, the quote raises questions about the nature of ideals and their influence on individuals' actions. Ideals are often seen as principles or standards that guide behavior and decision-making, reflecting a person's beliefs and values. However, the quote challenges the notion of ideals as universally binding, suggesting that they are, in fact, subjective and relative to the individual. This perspective aligns with the egoist's recognition that their ideals are personal to them and do not hold sway over their actions.

John Robinson's identification as a politician adds an interesting layer to the quote. It invites consideration of how egoism and the absence of ideals may manifest in the realm of politics. Politicians are often expected to adhere to certain ideals and principles in their decision-making and governance. However, the quote suggests that an egoistic politician may operate outside of these conventional expectations, prioritizing their own self-interest over the interest of ideals or broader societal values.

In conclusion, John Robinson's quote sheds light on the concept of egoism and its implications for the formation of ideals and decision-making. It challenges the notion of ideals as universally binding and highlights the freedom that comes with recognizing the subjective nature of one's ideals. The quote invites contemplation on the role of egoism in ethical theory and its potential impact in various domains, including politics.