Meaning: This quote by Felix Adler, an American educator and social reformer, speaks to the importance of public assemblies for the consideration of significant and profound topics that are of interest to humanity. In essence, Adler acknowledges the validity of the arguments against such gatherings, yet he emphasizes the crucial value of preserving the tradition of coming together for the contemplation of weighty matters.

The quote reflects Adler's belief in the intrinsic worth of communal discussions and the exchange of ideas in a public setting. It suggests that even when there are legitimate objections to the practice of convening in public assemblies for serious deliberations, the preservation of this tradition is essential due to its profound significance.

Adler's emphasis on the importance of public assemblies aligns with his broader commitment to ethical and intellectual engagement. As the founder of the Ethical Culture movement, he sought to promote moral and intellectual development through communal activities and discussions. His quote can be seen as an affirmation of the principles underlying this movement, highlighting the value of coming together to engage with weighty and meaningful topics.

In a contemporary context, the quote can be interpreted as a call to recognize and uphold the value of public forums for intellectual and moral discourse. It serves as a reminder of the need to preserve spaces where individuals can gather to deliberate on matters that are of profound importance to human society.

One potential interpretation of Adler's quote is that it speaks to the enduring significance of public discourse in a democratic society. The idea that the custom of meeting in public assembly for the consideration of serious topics is "too vitally precious to be lost" underscores the importance of ensuring that spaces for public dialogue and debate are maintained and protected. In an era marked by rapid technological change and the proliferation of digital communication, this sentiment may be particularly resonant, as it underscores the enduring value of face-to-face interaction and collective deliberation.

Moreover, the quote also raises questions about the challenges and potential threats to public assemblies in contemporary society. It prompts consideration of factors that may undermine the tradition of coming together for serious discussions, such as declining public participation, polarization, or the erosion of public spaces for dialogue. By acknowledging the force of objections to this practice, the quote encourages reflection on the obstacles that may hinder the preservation of public assemblies for the consideration of serious and exalted topics.

In conclusion, Felix Adler's quote encapsulates his belief in the enduring value of public assemblies for the contemplation of weighty matters. It underscores the importance of preserving spaces for communal deliberation on topics of profound human interest and serves as a reminder of the intrinsic worth of public discourse in a democratic society. Ultimately, the quote prompts consideration of the challenges and imperatives associated with upholding the tradition of gathering together for the consideration of serious and exalted topics.