Meaning: The quote by Elihu Root encapsulates the foundational principle underlying diplomatic discussions between nations: the assumption that every nation is willing to do justice. Elihu Root, a prominent lawyer and statesman, emphasizes the theoretical postulate that forms the basis of diplomatic negotiations and international relations. This principle reflects the belief that nations are inherently inclined to act justly and fairly in their interactions with one another.

Diplomatic discussions between nations are integral to the maintenance of international peace, security, and cooperation. These discussions often revolve around resolving conflicts, negotiating treaties, and addressing global challenges. The assumption of willingness to do justice serves as a fundamental premise that underpins these interactions. It implies that nations enter into diplomatic negotiations with the expectation that each party will uphold principles of fairness, equity, and adherence to international law.

The concept of justice in the context of diplomatic discussions encompasses a wide range of issues, including territorial disputes, trade agreements, human rights, and the resolution of conflicts. It involves upholding the rule of law, respecting sovereignty, and promoting the well-being of all nations and their citizens. The assumption of willingness to do justice reflects a belief in the capacity of nations to act in accordance with moral and ethical standards, even in the midst of complex geopolitical dynamics.

Elihu Root's quote highlights the idealistic foundation of diplomatic engagement. It suggests that despite the inherent complexities and competing interests in international relations, there exists a shared belief in the importance of justice as a guiding principle. This assumption forms the basis for constructive dialogue and negotiation between nations, as it implies a mutual commitment to seeking fair and equitable outcomes.

However, the real-world application of this theoretical postulate is often subject to challenges and complexities. In practice, diplomatic discussions can be influenced by power dynamics, historical grievances, and divergent national interests. The assumption of willingness to do justice may be tested in situations where conflicting priorities and values come into play, leading to protracted negotiations or deadlock.

Moreover, the interpretation of what constitutes justice can vary significantly across different nations and cultures. The diversity of legal systems, political ideologies, and societal norms can shape the perceptions of justice and fairness in diplomatic contexts. This diversity underscores the need for nuanced and culturally sensitive approaches to navigating diplomatic discussions and finding common ground.

In contemporary international relations, the assumption of willingness to do justice continues to be a guiding principle, albeit one that is constantly being reevaluated and renegotiated. As global challenges such as climate change, security threats, and economic inequalities become increasingly interconnected, the pursuit of justice in diplomatic discussions takes on added significance.

In conclusion, Elihu Root's quote encapsulates the foundational principle that underlies diplomatic discussions between nations, emphasizing the assumption of willingness to do justice. While this theoretical postulate represents an idealistic vision of international relations, it serves as a guiding principle for constructive dialogue and negotiation. However, the complexities and challenges inherent in diplomatic interactions underscore the ongoing need for thoughtful and pragmatic approaches to promoting justice and fairness in the international arena.