Meaning: The quote by Arundhati Roy sheds light on the political strategy of using communal divisions to secure votes, a practice that has been historically prevalent in Indian politics. The term "vote banks" refers to the practice of politicians targeting specific religious or communal groups to garner their support by stoking fears and animosities between different communities. This strategy is aimed at consolidating a particular community's vote in favor of a political party or candidate.

In India, where diversity is a defining characteristic, communal politics has been used as a means of gaining and maintaining political power. The manipulation of communal sentiments and the exploitation of religious or caste-based identities have been employed to create a sense of division and animosity between different groups. By positioning themselves as protectors or champions of certain communities, political parties have sought to secure the allegiance of these groups, often at the expense of fostering unity and a sense of shared national identity.

The consequences of such divisive tactics are far-reaching and have contributed to social tensions, violence, and a deepening of communal rifts. The concept of "pitting one community against another" has not only fueled distrust and animosity but has also hindered the progress of the nation as a whole. Instead of addressing the genuine needs and concerns of all citizens, politicians have often prioritized the manipulation of communal sentiments for short-term electoral gains.

Arundhati Roy's assertion that the Congress party, a prominent political entity in India, has historically engaged in covert communal politics highlights the systemic nature of this issue. It underscores the fact that communal politics has been perpetuated across party lines and has been a prevalent feature of India's political landscape. By implicating a specific political entity, Roy's statement draws attention to the complicity of major political players in perpetuating this damaging practice.

The quote also raises broader questions about the ethical implications of using communal divisions for political gain. It prompts reflection on the responsibilities of political leaders and the impact of their actions on the fabric of society. The manipulation of communal sentiments not only undermines the principles of equality and inclusion but also perpetuates a cycle of division and conflict that hinders the nation's progress.

In response to the prevalence of communal politics, there have been calls for a shift towards more inclusive and progressive forms of governance. Advocates for social harmony and unity emphasize the importance of policies and leadership that transcend narrow communal interests and prioritize the welfare of all citizens. Efforts to promote inter-community dialogue, understanding, and collaboration are seen as essential for countering the divisive forces of communal politics.

In conclusion, Arundhati Roy's quote encapsulates the insidious nature of communal politics in India and highlights the detrimental impact of manipulating communal divisions for electoral gains. It serves as a reminder of the urgent need to address this issue and work towards fostering a more inclusive and harmonious political landscape. By acknowledging the damaging effects of communal politics, there is an opportunity to strive towards a more equitable and unified society that prioritizes the well-being of all its citizens.